167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15771201)
1. ERISA's second wind: the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Aetna v Davila is a victory for health plans, but payers, providers must still negotiate potential mine fields.
Manzanares J; Mandell J
Healthc Leadersh Rep; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15771201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court's pre-emptive strike against patients' rights to sue their HMOs.
Kopels S; Manselle T
Soc Work Health Care; 2006; 43(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 16723332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
Ryland BK
Manag Care Interface; 2004 Oct; 17(10):55-8. PubMed ID: 15535079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations.
Jost TS
Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ERISA update: the Supreme Court Texas decision and other recent developments.
Butler PA
State Coverage Initiat Issue Brief; 2004 Aug; 5(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 15298011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cracks in the wall. Court decisions penetrate ERISA's invulnerability.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2003 Mar; 99(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 12674976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health plan liability and ERISA: the expanding scope of state legislation.
Hellinger FJ; Young GJ
Am J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 95(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 15671453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption?
Trueman DL
Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(2):427-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15281484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila: Implications for public health policy.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
Public Health Rep; 2004; 119(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 15313115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The United State Supreme Court and health law: the year in review. The Supreme Court federalizes managed care liability.
Ruger TW
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15490600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Zinberg JM
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15651122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives. Effects of PARCA liability measure hard to see behind ERISA's veil.
Cunningham R
Med Health; 1998 May; 52(19):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10179408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Subrogation or subterfuge: the myth of ERISA health benefit plans.
Murphy GF
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 19(1):309-33. PubMed ID: 12733230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care.
Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Major U.S. Supreme Court decision on participant remedies under ERISA.
Meadors GM
J Med Pract Manage; 2008; 24(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 18754254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.
Goodyear J
Columbia Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 101(5):1107-39. PubMed ID: 11942337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Standing--who may sue under ERISA?--Authorized agent of a fiduciary has no standing. COB Clearinghouse Corporation v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. et al.
Benefits Q; 2005; 21(4):76-7. PubMed ID: 16524039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
