247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15772108)
1. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Song X; Zhou XH
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Hillis SL; Obuchowski NA; Schartz KM; Berbaum KS
Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1579-607. PubMed ID: 15685718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
Song HH
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of the new methodology of analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves.
Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Yamauchi K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():837-40. PubMed ID: 10384578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
Yang Y; Jin Z
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Davidov O; Nov Y
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1030-46. PubMed ID: 19894216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three methods for analysing correlated ROC curves: a comparison in real data sets from multi-reader, multi-case studies with a factorial design.
Toledano AY
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2919-33. PubMed ID: 12953288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.
Ng EY; Kee EC
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-shot estimate of MRMC variance: AUC.
Gallas BD
Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 16488848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation.
Zheng Y; Barlow WE; Cutter G
Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 15737102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
Cai T
Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.
Cai T; Cheng S
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 18056687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification.
Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1534-41. PubMed ID: 16321742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.
Wagner RF; Beam CA; Beiden SV
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):561-72. PubMed ID: 15534338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
