These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The importance of assessing confounding and effect modification in research involving periodontal disease and systemic diseases. Hyman J J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 33(2):102-3. PubMed ID: 16441732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Confounding and effect modification: their significance in medical research. Olayinka BA Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Jan; 43(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 9185379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Occupational epidemiologic study design and application. Blair A; Hayes RB; Stewart PA; Zahm SH Occup Med; 1996; 11(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 8887376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias. Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observational studies: a review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding. Lu CY Int J Clin Pract; 2009 May; 63(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 19392919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpreting the term selection bias in medical research. Mark DH Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 9048175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Definition, sources, magnitude, effect modifiers, and strategies of reduction of the healthy worker effect. Choi BC J Occup Med; 1992 Oct; 34(10):979-88. PubMed ID: 1403198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Epidemiology: theory, study design, and planning for education. Harris SA J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2000; 20(3):133-45. PubMed ID: 11232249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is self-reported pain an appropriate outcome measure in ergonomic-epidemiologic studies of work-related musculoskeletal disorders? Schierhout GH; Myers JE Am J Ind Med; 1996 Jul; 30(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 8837690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Epidemiology and biostatistics in medical research, vol. 2 (causation and association, study design and biases)]. Kuwabara Y; Saito T; Inagaki Y Kokyu To Junkan; 1992 Feb; 40(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 1565878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Practical application of nonrandomized research to patient care: a case study of nesiritide. Winegardner ML; Reaume KT; Dabaja GS; Kalus JS Pharmacotherapy; 2007 Jan; 27(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17192168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interaction effects and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: more than meets the eye? Sevdalis N; Jacklin R J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):919-22. PubMed ID: 18373582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias: a review of current understanding. Adebiyi AO Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 39(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 21416795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors and their identification. First Part: What is a risk factor? Balkau B; Eschwege E Diabete Metab; 1995 Feb; 21(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 7781849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in epidemiologic studies: methacholine challenge testing in the field. Kennedy SM; Contreras GR Occup Med; 1993; 8(2):303-21. PubMed ID: 8506508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quality of life in patients with risk factors of coronary heart disease]. Kwaśniewska M; Drygas W Przegl Lek; 2005; 62(9):863-70. PubMed ID: 16541719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Confounding of indirect effects: a sensitivity analysis exploring the range of bias due to a cause common to both the mediator and the outcome. Hafeman DM Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 21652602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biases in the identification of risk factor thresholds and J-curves. Marschner IC; Simes RJ; Keech A Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 166(7):824-31. PubMed ID: 17644824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]