537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15772463)
21. Usage and survival implications of surgical staging of inguinal lymph nodes in intermediate- to high-risk, clinical localized penile cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis.
Woldu SL; Ci B; Hutchinson RC; Krabbe LM; Singla N; Passoni NM; Clinton TN; Raj GV; Miller DS; Sagalowsky AI; Lotan Y; Xie Y; Margulis V; Bagrodia A
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):159.e7-159.e17. PubMed ID: 29288008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Anatomical mapping of lymphatic drainage in penile carcinoma with SPECT-CT: implications for the extent of inguinal lymph node dissection.
Leijte JA; Valdés Olmos RA; Nieweg OE; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):885-90. PubMed ID: 18502024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is lymphadenectomy indicated in patients with T1 moderately differentiated penile cancer?
Malhotra SM; Rouse RV; Azzi R; Reese J
Can J Urol; 2009 Dec; 16(6):4895-9. PubMed ID: 20003662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival.
Lont AP; Kroon BK; Gallee MP; van Tinteren H; Moonen LM; Horenblas S
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):947-52; discussion 952. PubMed ID: 17296384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The risks of lymph node metastasis and the prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 50 patients treated with bilateral ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy.
Leewansangtong S; Srinualnad S; Chaiyaprasithi B; Taweemonkongsap T; Soontrapa S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Feb; 84(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 11336079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The influence of the T stage on the risk of metastasis of penis cancer: T1 vs. T2].
Naumann CM; van der Horst C; Volkmer B; Kurtz F; Martinéz Portillo FJ; Seif C; Hautmann S; Braun PM; Hautmann R; Jünemann KP
Urologe A; 2006 Nov; 45(11):1424, 1426-30. PubMed ID: 16906416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection vs. unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection and dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
Nazzani S; Catanzaro M; Biasoni D; Maccauro M; Stagni S; Torelli T; Macchi A; Bernasconi V; Taverna A; Sessa D; Lorenzoni A; Piva L; Lanocita R; Cascella T; Cattaneo L; Montanari E; Salvioni R; Nicolai N
Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 41(4):210.e1-210.e8. PubMed ID: 36868883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Extended lymphadenectomy in penile cancer.
Pompeo AC
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():30-6; discussion 97-8. PubMed ID: 15780162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Controversies over regional lymphadenectomy in carcinoma of the penis].
Cózar Olmo JM; Navarro J; de la Peña J; Cisneros J; Cárcamo Valor P; García-Matres MJ; Martínez-Piñeiro L; Martínez-Piñeiro JA
Arch Esp Urol; 1991 Oct; 44(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 1796857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The prognostic index: a useful pathologic guide for prediction of nodal metastases and survival in penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Chaux A; Caballero C; Soares F; Guimarães GC; Cunha IW; Reuter V; Barreto J; Rodríguez I; Cubilla AL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jul; 33(7):1049-57. PubMed ID: 19384188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinically node-negative penile cancer versus radical inguinal lymphadenectomy: a comparative study.
Perdonà S; Autorino R; De Sio M; Di Lorenzo G; Gallo L; Damiano R; D'Armiento M; Gallo A
Urology; 2005 Dec; 66(6):1282-6. PubMed ID: 16360457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Single-port robotic inguinal lymph node dissection: A safe and feasible option for penile cancer.
Patel AS; Isharwal S
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101633. PubMed ID: 34332496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lymphadenectomy in penile cancer.
Horenblas S
Urol Clin North Am; 2011 Nov; 38(4):459-69, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 22045177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predicting pelvic lymph node metastases in penile cancer patients: a comparison of computed tomography, Cloquet's node, and disease burden of inguinal lymph nodes.
Zhu Y; Zhang SL; Ye DW; Yao XD; Jiang ZX; Zhou XY
Onkologie; 2008 Feb; 31(1-2):37-41. PubMed ID: 18268397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes.
Theodorescu D; Russo P; Zhang ZF; Morash C; Fair WR
J Urol; 1996 May; 155(5):1626-31. PubMed ID: 8627839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Treatment of lymph nodes in epidermoid carcinoma of the penis: review of literature by the Committee of Cancerology of the French Association of Urology-External Genital Organs Group (CCAFU-OGE)].
Marconnet L; Bouchot O; Culine S; Avances C; Rigaud J;
Prog Urol; 2010 May; 20(5):332-42. PubMed ID: 20471577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases.
Kroon BK; Horenblas S; Lont AP; Tanis PJ; Gallee MP; Nieweg OE
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):816-9. PubMed ID: 15711276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is it possible to predict the need of inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis? A clinical and a pathological study.
Minardi D; Lucarini G; Simonetti O; Di Primio R; Montironi R; Muzzonigro G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2015 Mar; 87(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25847894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Modified radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis: technique and results.
Jacobellis U
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1349-52. PubMed ID: 12629358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Risk stratification in penile carcinoma: 25-year experience with surgical inguinal lymph node staging.
Hungerhuber E; Schlenker B; Karl A; Frimberger D; Rothenberger KH; Stief CG; Schneede P
Urology; 2006 Sep; 68(3):621-5. PubMed ID: 16979733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
