These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15772599)

  • 1. Image quality of film transparency printer output of digital dental radiographs.
    Sakurai T; Matsumoto Y; Onoyama K; Kawamata R; Kashima I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 15772599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suitability of the general-purpose graphic printer as an image output device for digital dental x-ray images.
    Nishikawa K; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 10710467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of individually calibrated customary printers for assessment of typical dental diagnoses on glossy paper prints: a multicenter pilot study.
    Schulze RK; Schulze D; Voss K; Rottner M; Keller HP; Dollmann K; Maager B; Wedel M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 18299235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introducing digital radiography in the dental office: an overview.
    Petrikowski CG
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Oct; 71(9):651. PubMed ID: 16271162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
    Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an Epson flatbed scanner to read Gafchromic EBT films for radiation dosimetry.
    Ferreira BC; Lopes MC; Capela M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1073-85. PubMed ID: 19168937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Digital X-ray mammography: comparison of the image quality achievable with a wet laser imager, a dry infrared laser imager and a dry laser imager using direct thermography].
    Krug B; Stützer H; Zähringer M; Morgenroth C; Winnekendonk G; Gossmann A; Warm M; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2005 Jul; 177(7):955-61. PubMed ID: 15973597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Ludlow J; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of scintillator on the modulation transfer function (MTF) of a digital imaging system.
    Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 May; 99(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 15829886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental digital photo potpourri.
    Goldstein MB
    Dent Today; 2006 May; 25(5):122-5. PubMed ID: 16729509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The gray-scale ink-jet printer: value in making hard copies of digital images.
    Combs MJ; Snell J; Cail WS; Maier T; Buck DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):225-7. PubMed ID: 7998544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral x-ray sensor.
    Tsuchida R; Araki K; Endo A; Funahashi I; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 16243247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
    Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Printed radiographs--is what you see what you get?
    Gerrard G
    Dent Update; 2013 Oct; 40(8):637-8, 641. PubMed ID: 24279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Production of radioactive quality assurance phantoms using a standard inkjet printer.
    van Staden JA; du Raan H; Lötter MG; van Aswegen A; Herbst CP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):N329-37. PubMed ID: 17634634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.