These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15772601)

  • 1. Length of endodontic files measured in digital radiographs with and without noise-suppression filters: an ex-vivo study.
    Brüllmann DD; Röhrig B; Sulayman SL; Schulze R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Mar; 40(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 21346084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Different Image Processing Techniques on the Measurement Accuracy of Endodontics File Length.
    Nikneshan S; Boroumand R; Esmaeeli N; Azadikhah A; Paknahad M
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2023 Sep; 24(3):335-341. PubMed ID: 37727355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Four Obturation Methods in Deciduous Teeth Using Digital Radiography: An
    Raju SS; Reddy RE; Rani TS; Merum K; Mudusu SP; Tulluru AM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(Suppl 1):S52-S56. PubMed ID: 35645507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of digital image enhancement in detection of vertical and horizontal root fracture.
    Ghazizadeh M; Sheikhi M; Aminian M; Ghazizadeh MM
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2020; 17(4):266-272. PubMed ID: 33282152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of Intraoral and Extraoral Periapical Radiographic Techniques in Determination of Working Length: An
    Sridhara A; Konde S; Noojadi SR; Kumar NC; Belludi AC
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(3):211-216. PubMed ID: 32904081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography voxel density and linear distance measurement at different voxel sizes: A study on sheep head cadaver.
    Güngör E; Doğan MS
    J Dent Sci; 2017 Jun; 12(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 30895040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the accuracy of conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination: An invitro study.
    Yaghooti Khorasani MM; Ebrahimnejad H
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2017; 11(3):161-165. PubMed ID: 29184631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiography in Internal Root Resorption.
    Madani Z; Moudi E; Bijani A; Mahmoudi E
    Iran Endod J; 2016; 11(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 26843878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Contrast Inversion Enhancement on the Accuracy of Endodontic File Length Determination in Digital Radiography.
    Farhadi N; Shokraneh A; Mehdizadeh M
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 May; 9(5):ZC102-5. PubMed ID: 26155552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Mohtavipour ST; Dalili Z; Azar NG
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Mar; 41(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 21977467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of intra-oral digital imaging modalities: Charged Couple Device versus Storage Phosphor Plate.
    Anas A; Asaad J; Tarboush K
    Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2010 Nov; 4(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 21475554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of digital radiography in orthopaedic applications.
    Fowler JR; Ilyas AM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 469(6):1781-4. PubMed ID: 20972654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics.
    Vandenberghe B; Bud M; Sutanto A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth.
    Haiter-Neto F; dos Anjos Pontual A; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Sep; 12(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 18210170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length.
    Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination.
    Powell-Cullingford AW; Pitt Ford TR
    Int Endod J; 1993 Sep; 26(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 8300258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.