These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1577337)

  • 21. Footprint and radiographic analysis of the feet.
    Kanatli U; Yetkin H; Cila E
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2001; 21(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 11242255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examination of the Correlation Between Foot Morphology Measurements Using Pedography and Radiographic Measurements.
    Inui K; Ikoma K; Imai K; Ohashi S; Maki M; Kido M; Hara Y; Oka Y; Fujiwara H; Kubo T
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 28117255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the medial longitudinal arch: a comparison between the dynamic plantar pressure measurement system and radiographic analysis.
    Yalçin N; Esen E; Kanatli U; Yetkin H
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 21088466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity.
    Williams DS; McClay IS
    Phys Ther; 2000 Sep; 80(9):864-71. PubMed ID: 10960934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Relationship Between Arch Height and Arch Flexibility
    Zifchock RA; Theriot C; Hillstrom HJ; Song J; Neary M
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Mar; 107(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 28198638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population.
    Scholz T; Zech A; Wegscheider K; Lezius S; Braumann KM; Sehner S; Hollander K
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Sep; 107(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 28708428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints.
    Cavanagh PR; Rodgers MM
    J Biomech; 1987; 20(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 3611129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch.
    Saltzman CL; Nawoczenski DA; Talbot KD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 Jan; 76(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 7811174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed(®) M system.
    Tong JW; Kong PW
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 23266249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examining the validity of selected measures of foot type: a preliminary study.
    Mathieson I; Upton D; Prior TD
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2004; 94(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15153590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability of a New Method to Determine Foot Arch Height for Clinicians.
    Charles JA; Mignot C; Jelinek HF
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2019 May; 109(3):187-192. PubMed ID: 31268787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flatfoot diagnosis by a unique bimodal distribution of footprint index in children.
    Chang CH; Chen YC; Yang WT; Ho PC; Hwang AW; Chen CH; Chang JH; Chang LW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115808. PubMed ID: 25551228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inter- and intraclass correlations for three standard foot radiographic measurements for plantar surface angles. Which measure is most reliable?
    Hohmann E; Myburgh J; Keough N; Tetsworth K; Glatt V
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Oct; 25(5):646-653. PubMed ID: 30321930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The correlation between selected measurements from footprint and radiograph of flatfoot.
    Chen CH; Huang MH; Chen TW; Weng MC; Lee CL; Wang GJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 87(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 16442978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An Investigation of Structure, Flexibility, and Function Variables that Discriminate Asymptomatic Foot Types.
    Shultz SP; Song J; Kraszewski AP; Hafer JF; Rao S; Backus S; Hillstrom RM; Hillstrom HJ
    J Appl Biomech; 2017 Jul; 33(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 27992254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The identification and reliability of static and dynamic barefoot impression measurements: A systematic review.
    Hu A; Arnold JB; Causby R; Jones S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Aug; 289():156-164. PubMed ID: 29864603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comprehensively analysis the correlation between the height of a person and the length of his/her footprint].
    Hu XY; Yao HF; Lin JH
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 21(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 15895801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship of Body Mass Index and Footprint Morphology to the Actual Height of the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot.
    Rosende-Bautista C; Munuera-Martínez PV; Seoane-Pillado T; Reina-Bueno M; Alonso-Tajes F; Pérez-García S; Domínguez-Maldonado G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(18):. PubMed ID: 34574735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running.
    Nigg BM; Cole GK; Nachbauer W
    J Biomech; 1993 Aug; 26(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 8349716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Association of footprint measurements with plantar kinetics: a linear regression model.
    Fascione JM; Crews RT; Wrobel JS
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 24725031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.