158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15773596)
1. Follow-up to the revised Cancer Program Standards 2004.
O'Leary J
J Oncol Manag; 2005; 14(1):5. PubMed ID: 15773596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Modifications and clarifications to Cancer Program Standards 2004.
O'Leary J
J Oncol Manag; 2004; 13(6):9. PubMed ID: 15648219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Report from the American College of Oncology Administrators' (ACOA) liaison to the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (ACoS-CoC). New cancer program standards highlighted.
O'Leary J; ;
J Oncol Manag; 2003; 12(3):7. PubMed ID: 12803444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The National Cancer Data Base and physician network.
Menck HR; Blankenship C; Fremgen AM
Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):45-59. PubMed ID: 10165387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Report offers guidance to Georgia in measuring quality, progress in cancer care.
Marwick C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(11):796. PubMed ID: 15928299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the NCDB for cancer care improvement: an introduction to available quality assessment tools.
Raval MV; Bilimoria KY; Stewart AK; Bentrem DJ; Ko CY
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 99(8):488-90. PubMed ID: 19466738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there a role for the surgeon in today's cancer management?
Murphy GP
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1995 Mar; 80(3):23-9, 42. PubMed ID: 10140621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Position statement on cancer patient care evaluation: Commission on Cancer, American College of Surgeons.
Mayer A
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1976 Feb; 61(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 10241016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. National quality validation programs for breast centers.
Kaufman CS
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2007 Oct; 7(10):1357-62. PubMed ID: 17944561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States?
Malin JL; Schneider EC; Epstein AM; Adams J; Emanuel EJ; Kahn KL
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Feb; 24(4):626-34. PubMed ID: 16401682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk management, Part one. Recommendations for the freestanding oncology center.
Wong HH
Adm Radiol; 1989 Jan; 8(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 10291992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [How can patient care be improved? Goal: compulsory standards for lung cancer (interview by Dr. Jochen Aumiller)].
Thomas M
MMW Fortschr Med; 2009 Apr; 151(15):16. PubMed ID: 19728673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A conversation with William T. McGivney, PhD.
McGivney WT
Manag Care Interface; 1999 Jun; 12(6):60-3. PubMed ID: 10538461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Groundbreaking initiative seeks new answers in breast cancer care.
Dis Manag Advis; 2006 Feb; 12(2):15-8, 13. PubMed ID: 16555675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical oncology in the community cancer center. Preface.
Greene FL
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):xv-xvi. PubMed ID: 21640910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The grocery store syndrome. A guest editorial on the extreme effects of competition on cancer research, innovation, and quality of care.
Mortenson LE
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1988; 15(5):545-6. PubMed ID: 3200750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assurance in the care of the cancer patient.
Holleb AI
CA Cancer J Clin; 1989; 39(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 2503234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward comprehensive cancer management in Canada: lessons from the United States.
Schipper H; Nemecek A
CMAJ; 1991 Jun; 144(11):1405-7, 1411-4. PubMed ID: 2032194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient feedback.
Tobin E
Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):51-3. PubMed ID: 10112047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the Commission on Cancer?
Wilson RE
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1982 Sep; 67(9):15-6. PubMed ID: 10256454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
