315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15773608)
1. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Processing of low spatial frequency faces at periphery in choice reaching tasks.
Awasthi B; Friedman J; Williams MA
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2136-41. PubMed ID: 21397615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.
Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A
Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges.
Goffaux V
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 18166166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Features are also important: contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition.
Cabeza R; Kato T
Psychol Sci; 2000 Sep; 11(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 11228917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces.
Cheung OS; Richler JJ; Palmeri TJ; Gauthier I
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1327-36. PubMed ID: 19045978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Configural and featural discriminations use the same spatial frequencies: a model observer versus human observer analysis.
Collin CA; Rainville S; Watier N; Boutet I
Perception; 2014; 43(6):509-26. PubMed ID: 25154285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.
Mondloch CJ; Le Grand R; Maurer D
Perception; 2002; 31(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 12044096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of face spatial frequencies on cortical processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.
Hsiao FJ; Hsieh JC; Lin YY; Chang Y
Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 15854750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recognizing degraded faces: the contribution of configural and featural cues.
Gilad-Gutnick S; Sinha P
Perception; 2012; 41(12):1497-511. PubMed ID: 23586289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Configural processing and perceptions of head tilt.
Collishaw SM; Hole GJ; Schwaninger A
Perception; 2005; 34(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 15832567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lateralised repetition priming for featurally and configurally manipulated familiar faces: evidence for differentially lateralised processing mechanisms.
Bourne VJ; Vladeanu M; Hole GJ
Laterality; 2009 May; 14(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 18949655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
