These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15773608)

  • 21. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aging Strikes the Self-Face Advantage in Featural Processing.
    Qian H; Wang Z; Yan L; Gao X
    Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(4):379-390. PubMed ID: 28718751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Face viewpoint effects about three axes: the role of configural and featural processing.
    Favelle SK; Palmisano S; Avery G
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):761-84. PubMed ID: 22128550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Face recognition in 4- to 7-year-olds: processing of configural, featural, and paraphernalia information.
    Freire A; Lee K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Dec; 80(4):347-71. PubMed ID: 11689035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.
    Zachariou V; Nikas CV; Safiullah ZN; Gotts SJ; Ungerleider LG
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Aug; 27(8):4124-4138. PubMed ID: 27522076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1023-39. PubMed ID: 16846295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Neural mechanisms of face recognition: an event-related potential study].
    Tobimatsu S
    Brain Nerve; 2012 Jul; 64(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 22764343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
    Isaac L; Lincoln A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.
    Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The perception of unfamiliar faces and houses by chimpanzees: influence of rotation angle.
    Parr LA; Heintz M
    Perception; 2006; 35(11):1473-83. PubMed ID: 17286118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.
    Carbon CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):859-74. PubMed ID: 22403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of configural processing on the perceptual spatial resolution for face features.
    Namdar G; Avidan G; Ganel T
    Cortex; 2015 Nov; 72():115-123. PubMed ID: 25998751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do low spatial frequencies explain the extremely fast saccades towards human faces?
    Guyader N; Chauvin A; Boucart M; Peyrin C
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():100-111. PubMed ID: 28202396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proficient use of low spatial frequencies facilitates face memory but shows protracted maturation throughout adolescence.
    Peters JC; Kemner C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():61-67. PubMed ID: 28732282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patients with schizophrenia are biased toward low spatial frequency to decode facial expression at a glance.
    Laprévote V; Oliva A; Delerue C; Thomas P; Boucart M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4164-8. PubMed ID: 20955721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception.
    Fiorentini A; Maffei L; Sandini G
    Perception; 2013; 42(11):1151-7. PubMed ID: 24601028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.