These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15773608)

  • 41. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing.
    Leder H
    Perception; 1996; 25(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 8804099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effect of spatial frequency on perceptual learning of inverted faces.
    de Heering A; Maurer D
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 86():107-14. PubMed ID: 23643906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Faster, stronger, lateralized: low spatial frequency information supports face processing.
    Awasthi B; Friedman J; Williams MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3583-90. PubMed ID: 21939676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Processing of featural and configural aspects of faces is lateralized in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS study.
    Renzi C; Schiavi S; Carbon CC; Vecchi T; Silvanto J; Cattaneo Z
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():45-51. PubMed ID: 23435211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Configural and featural processing during face perception: a new stimulus set.
    Van Belle G; De Smet M; De Graef P; Van Gool L; Verfaillie K
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 19363168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Face imagery is based on featural representations.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18271353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2002; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 11954691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception.
    Rossion B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):274-89. PubMed ID: 18396260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The face of aging: sensitivity to facial feature relations changes with age.
    Murray JE; Halberstadt J; Ruffman T
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):846-50. PubMed ID: 20677879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Face processing in 8-month-old infants: evidence for configural and analytical processing.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N
    Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2783-93. PubMed ID: 14568095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Process and domain specificity in regions engaged for face processing: an fMRI study of perceptual differentiation.
    Collins HR; Zhu X; Bhatt RS; Clark JD; Joseph JE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 24(12):2428-44. PubMed ID: 22849402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Featural and configural face processing differentially modulate ERP components.
    Mercure E; Dick F; Johnson MH
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():162-70. PubMed ID: 18722354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B; Sorger B; Schiltz C; Goebel R
    J Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 3(Pt 1):45-67. PubMed ID: 19338716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.
    Wang H; Chen E; Li J; Ji F; Lian Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():884823. PubMed ID: 35496070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The discriminability of local cues determines the strength of holistic face processing.
    Goffaux V
    Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 64():17-22. PubMed ID: 22613193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Increased fusiform area activation in schizophrenia during processing of spatial frequency-degraded faces, as revealed by fMRI.
    Silverstein SM; All SD; Kasi R; Berten S; Essex B; Lathrop KL; Little DM
    Psychol Med; 2010 Jul; 40(7):1159-69. PubMed ID: 19895721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Tolerance to spatial-relational transformations in unfamiliar faces: A further challenge to a configural processing account of identity recognition.
    Lorenzino M; Caminati M; Caudek C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():25-38. PubMed ID: 29807303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.
    Boutet I; Collin C; Faubert J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1078-93. PubMed ID: 14674634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Time Sequence of Face Spatial Frequency Differs During Working Memory Encoding and Retrieval Stages.
    Wang A; Chen E; Zhang H; Borjigin CH; Wang H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():853992. PubMed ID: 35668961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.