1069 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1577393)
1. Diagnostic assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: what is possible vs. what is practical?
Armstrong D; Emde C; Inauen W; Blum AL
Hepatogastroenterology; 1992 Feb; 39 Suppl 1():3-13. PubMed ID: 1577393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.
Armstrong D
Yale J Biol Med; 1999; 72(2-3):93-100. PubMed ID: 10780570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Postoperative evaluation of esophageal mucosal change dynamics in patients with reflux diseases].
Wallner G; Misiuna P; Chibowski D; Polkowski W; Abramowicz K; Sory A
Wiad Lek; 1997; 50 Suppl 1 Pt 1():273-81. PubMed ID: 9446369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in manometry and 24-H ambulatory pH-metry between patients with and without endoscopic or histological esophagitis in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Kasapidis P; Xynos E; Mantides A; Chrysos E; Demonakou M; Nikolopoulos N; Vassilakis JS
Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Nov; 88(11):1893-9. PubMed ID: 8237938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring gastroesophageal reflux disease: relationship between the Health-Related Quality of Life score and physiologic parameters.
Velanovich V; Karmy-Jones R
Am Surg; 1998 Jul; 64(7):649-53. PubMed ID: 9655276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual site ambulatory pH monitoring: a probe across the lower esophageal sphincter does not induce gastroesophageal reflux.
Decktor DL; Krawet SH; Rodriguez SL; Robinson M; Castell DO
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1162-6. PubMed ID: 8651164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux.
Oelschlager BK; Chang L; Pope CE; Pellegrini CA
J Surg Res; 2005 Sep; 128(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16115493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of clinical severity and investigation of uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease and noncardiac angina-like chest pain.
Lemire S
Can J Gastroenterol; 1997 Sep; 11 Suppl B():37B-40B. PubMed ID: 9347176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring.
DeMeester TR; Wang CI; Wernly JA; Pellegrini CA; Little AG; Klementschitsch P; Bermudez G; Johnson LF; Skinner DB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 May; 79(5):656-70. PubMed ID: 7366233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Features of gastroesophageal reflux disease in women.
Lin M; Gerson LB; Lascar R; Davila M; Triadafilopoulos G
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Aug; 99(8):1442-7. PubMed ID: 15307857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Esophageal motor dysfunction and acid exposure in reflux esophagitis are more severe if Barrett's metaplasia is present.
Singh P; Taylor RH; Colin-Jones DG
Am J Gastroenterol; 1994 Mar; 89(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 8122643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ambulatory 24-hour pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Determination of criteria and relation to endoscopy.
Masclee AA; de Best AC; de Graaf R; Cluysenaer OJ; Jansen JB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 1990 Mar; 25(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 2181620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of esophageal manometry and gastroesophageal pH monitoring for responsiveness of reflux disease to medical therapy in children.
Cucchiara S; Campanozzi A; Greco L; Franco MT; Emiliano M; Alfieri E; Calabrese F; Numeroso V
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Apr; 91(4):680-5. PubMed ID: 8677928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Belching: dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease?
Lin M; Triadafilopoulos G
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 98(10):2139-45. PubMed ID: 14572558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hiatal hernia size is the dominant determinant of esophagitis presence and severity in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Jones MP; Sloan SS; Rabine JC; Ebert CC; Huang CF; Kahrilas PJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Jun; 96(6):1711-7. PubMed ID: 11419819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Esophageal mucosal eicosanoids in gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus.
Triadafilopoulos G; Kaczynska M; Iwane M
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jan; 91(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 8561146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is Barrett's esophagus characterized by more pronounced acid reflux than severe esophagitis?
Coenraad M; Masclee AA; Straathof JW; Ganesh S; Griffioen G; Lamers CB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Jul; 93(7):1068-72. PubMed ID: 9672332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics and clinical relevance of proximal esophageal pH monitoring.
Cool M; Poelmans J; Feenstra L; Tack J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Dec; 99(12):2317-23. PubMed ID: 15571576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
