These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15773950)

  • 1. Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision.
    Sacks BN; Mitchell BR; Williams CL; Ernest HB
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(4):1241-9. PubMed ID: 15773950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population structure of California coyotes corresponds to habitat-specific breaks and illuminates species history.
    Sacks BN; Brown SK; Ernest HB
    Mol Ecol; 2004 May; 13(5):1265-75. PubMed ID: 15078462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coyotes demonstrate how habitat specialization by individuals of a generalist species can diversify populations in a heterogeneous ecoregion.
    Sacks BN; Bannasch DL; Chomel BB; Ernest HB
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Jul; 25(7):1384-94. PubMed ID: 18391065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?
    Berger KM; Gese EM
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Nov; 76(6):1075-85. PubMed ID: 17922704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sympatric wolf and coyote populations of the western Great Lakes region are reproductively isolated.
    Wheeldon TJ; Patterson BR; White BN
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Oct; 19(20):4428-40. PubMed ID: 20854277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Coyotes (Canis latrans).
    Hinton JW; van Manen FT; Chamberlain MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132203. PubMed ID: 26148130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring coyote population dynamics by genotyping faeces.
    Prugh LR; Ritland CE; Arthur SM; Krebs CJ
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(5):1585-96. PubMed ID: 15813796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores.
    Riley SP; Pollinger JP; Sauvajot RM; York EC; Bromley C; Fuller TK; Wayne RK
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jun; 15(7):1733-41. PubMed ID: 16689893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial genetic and morphologic structure of wolves and coyotes in relation to environmental heterogeneity in a Canis hybrid zone.
    Benson JF; Patterson BR; Wheeldon TJ
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Dec; 21(24):5934-54. PubMed ID: 23173981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans).
    Ward JN; Hinton JW; Johannsen KL; Karlin ML; Miller KV; Chamberlain MJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0203703. PubMed ID: 30303970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial ecology of coyotes in the urbanizing landscape of the Cuyahoga Valley, Ohio.
    Franckowiak GA; Perdicas M; Smith GA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0227028. PubMed ID: 31887177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Panmixia and Limited Interspecific Introgression in Coyotes (Canis latrans) from West Virginia and Virginia, USA.
    Bohling JH; Mastro LL; Adams JR; Gese EM; Owen SF; Waits LP
    J Hered; 2017 Sep; 108(6):608-617. PubMed ID: 28821188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ontogeny of expression of communicative genes in coyote-beagle hybrids.
    Moon-Fanelli A
    Behav Genet; 2011 Nov; 41(6):858-75. PubMed ID: 21573986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Locating hybrid individuals in the red wolf (Canis rufus) experimental population area using a spatially targeted sampling strategy and faecal DNA genotyping.
    Adams JR; Lucash C; Schutte L; Waits LP
    Mol Ecol; 2007 May; 16(9):1823-34. PubMed ID: 17444895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Land cover and space use influence coyote carnivory: evidence from stable-isotope analysis.
    Webster SC; Hinton JW; Chamberlain MJ; Murphy JJ; Beasley JC
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17457. PubMed ID: 38854793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Origin and status of the Great Lakes wolf.
    Koblmüller S; Nord M; Wayne RK; Leonard JA
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jun; 18(11):2313-26. PubMed ID: 19366404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-specific territoriality in a Canis hybrid zone: spatial segregation between wolves, coyotes, and hybrids.
    Benson JF; Patterson BR
    Oecologia; 2013 Dec; 173(4):1539-50. PubMed ID: 23864253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wolves in the Great Lakes region: a phylogeographic puzzle.
    Randi E
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Oct; 19(20):4386-8. PubMed ID: 21040036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors.
    Gese EM; Ruff RL
    Anim Behav; 1997 Nov; 54(5):1155-66. PubMed ID: 9398369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fine-scale movements and behaviors of coyotes (
    Chamberlain MJ; Cohen BS; Wightman PH; Rushton E; Hinton JW
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jul; 11(14):9575-9588. PubMed ID: 34306644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.