140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15774110)
1. [A clinical report on the use of burst mode phacoemulsification].
Yang J; Lu Y
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 41(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15774110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Phacoemulsification using burst mode].
Liu YZ; Cheng B
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 40(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 15268830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phacoemulsification parameters: series 20000 Legacy Versus Legacy with AdvanTec software and NeoSoniX handpiece.
Jirásková N; Rozsíval P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jan; 30(1):144-8. PubMed ID: 14967282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound energy and endothelial cell loss with stop-and-chop and nuclear preslice phacoemulsification.
Pereira AC; Porfírio F; Freitas LL; Belfort R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1661-6. PubMed ID: 17010864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative clinical trial of ultrasound phacoemulsification with and without the WhiteStar system.
Fishkind W; Bakewell B; Donnenfeld ED; Rose AD; Watkins LA; Olson RJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 16516777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
Crema AS; Walsh A; Yamane Y; Nosé W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.
Liu Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Yuan Z; Xia Y; Zeng Y
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17276271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification compared with manual small-incision cataract surgery by a randomized controlled clinical trial: six-week results.
Gogate PM; Kulkarni SR; Krishnaiah S; Deshpande RD; Joshi SA; Palimkar A; Deshpande MD
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 15878068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal endothelial cell loss during phacoemulsification: bevel-up versus bevel-down phaco tip.
Faramarzi A; Javadi MA; Karimian F; Jafarinasab MR; Baradaran-Rafii A; Jafari F; Yaseri M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1971-6. PubMed ID: 21940143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique.
Storr-Paulsen A; Norregaard JC; Ahmed S; Storr-Paulsen T; Pedersen TH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 18499008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative corneal swelling correlates strongly to corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
Lundberg B; Jonsson M; Behndig A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 139(6):1035-41. PubMed ID: 15953433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative study of endothelial changes in cataract surgery with phacoemulsification technique].
Chiotoroiu S; Pandelescu M; Epure C; Stefaniu I
Oftalmologia; 2008; 52(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 18714498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Influence of 3.0 mm incision coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery (MICS) on corneal thickness].
Wylegała E; Rebkowska-Juraszek M; Dobrowolski D; Woyna-Orlewicz A
Klin Oczna; 2009; 111(7-9):207-11. PubMed ID: 19899575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical significance of accumulated energy complex parameter in phacoemulsification].
Wang X; Zhou L; Huang Y
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Oct; 38(10):610-3. PubMed ID: 12487911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of hydrodynamic parameters on corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification.
Baradaran-Rafii A; Rahmati-Kamel M; Eslani M; Kiavash V; Karimian F
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):732-7. PubMed ID: 19304097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
