223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15774986)
1. US defeated on antiabortion statements at UN women's meeting.
Tanne JH
BMJ; 2005 Mar; 330(7492):621. PubMed ID: 15774986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hope, healing, and justice in the abortion debate.
Vogel A
Ethics Med; 2000; 16(3):86-90. PubMed ID: 15040348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
Ching B
Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The war against choice: inside the antiabortion movement.
English D
Mother Jones; 1981; 6(11):16-32. PubMed ID: 11655456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Under the radar.
Tumulty K; Novak V
Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 12577595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and politics in Nicaragua: the women's movement in the debate on the Abortion Law Reform 1999-2002.
Heumann SG
Cult Health Sex; 2007; 9(3):217-31. PubMed ID: 17457727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends that will affect your future ... a different kind of woman.
Schwartz SA
Explore (NY); 2006 May; 2(3):198-9. PubMed ID: 16781641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Banning abortion and contraception infringes women's right to health, UN assembly hears.
Torjesen I
BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d7046. PubMed ID: 22042775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again?
Forde C
Conscience; 2005; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The argument that never ends.
Simon R
US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt and the Current Implications for Abortion Access.
Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
Birth; 2017 Mar; 44(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 27933647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The women of Roe v. Wade.
Glendon MA
Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole Women's Victory - or Not?
Charo RA
N Engl J Med; 2016 Sep; 375(9):809-11. PubMed ID: 27579630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Justice and the fetus: Rawls, children, and abortion.
Shaw DM
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Jan; 20(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 21223613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reflections on the legalisation of abortion in Portugal.
Oliveira da Silva M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Aug; 14(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 19526419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Political decision adversely affects women's health.
Thomson A
Midwifery; 2001 Mar; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 11207099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Right-to-lifers not terrorists.
Bragg S
Occup Health Saf; 1994 Dec; 63(12):27. PubMed ID: 15655984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
Burdick R
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
