These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

633 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15775929)

  • 1. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.
    Murata H; Hong G; Li YA; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 15775929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability and surface roughness of a tissue conditioner material.
    Khaledi A; Borhanihaghighi Z; Vojdani M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 22124041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution.
    Abdullah MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 16765160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of tissue conditioners upon the surface hardness of dental stone and improved dental stone.
    Panagiotouni E; Pissiotis A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Dec; 2(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 7920395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alcohol-free tissue conditioner--a laboratory evaluation.
    Murata H; Narasaki Y; Hamada T; McCabe JF
    J Dent; 2006 Apr; 34(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 16216404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of tissue conditioners on the dynamic viscoelastic properties of a heat-polymerized denture base.
    Murata H; Toki K; Hong G; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 12447218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of polishing on surface roughness of tissue conditioners.
    Loney RW; Price RB; Murphy DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11203634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface roughness of impression materials and dental stones scanned by non-contacting laser profilometry.
    Rodriguez JM; Curtis RV; Bartlett DW
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 19036424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with sodium hypochlorite. Part II: Effect on gypsum.
    Vandewalle KS; Charlton DG; Schwartz RS; Reagan SE; Koeppen RG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 7993542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of tissue conditioning materials.
    Pissiotis A; Panagiotouni E; Sofou A; Diakoyanni I; Kaloyannides A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Dec; 3(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 8605503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weight loss and surface roughness of hard chairside reline resins after toothbrushing: influence of postpolymerization treatments.
    Mendonça MJ; Machado AL; Giampaolo ET; Pavarina AC; Vergani CE
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 16752627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some effects of disinfecting solutions on the properties of alginate impression material and dental stone.
    Boden J; Likeman P; Clark R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001; 9(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 12192949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of disinfectants on the properties of dental gypsum, part 2: surface properties.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Dec; 11(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 12501136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stone.
    Al-Abidi K; Ellakwa A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):17-28. PubMed ID: 16957787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants.
    DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Type IV gypsum compatibility with five addition-reaction silicone impression materials.
    Butta R; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Moles DR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):540-4. PubMed ID: 15942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.