These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1577628)

  • 41. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test.
    Jansen S; Luts H; Dejonckere P; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 23782715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Methods of determining hearing loss in workers in noisy occupations in conformance with the state standard].
    Ostapkovich VE; Suvorov GA; Shkarinov LN; Ponomareva NI; Denisov EI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981; (4):12-6. PubMed ID: 7303365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [High-frequency audiometry for the early diagnosis of occupational acoustic trauma].
    Bartsch R; Brückner C; Dieroff HG
    Z Gesamte Hyg; 1989; 35(8):493-6. PubMed ID: 2815879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Occupational hearing loss in farmers.
    Plakke BL; Dare E
    Public Health Rep; 1992; 107(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 1561302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Extent and frequency of noise-induced hearing loss in miners depending on the intensity and duration of noise exposure].
    Bolm U; Bründel KH
    HNO; 1979 Oct; 27(10):351-4. PubMed ID: 528234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Deterioration of noise-induced hearing loss among bottling factory workers.
    Ologe FE; Olajide TG; Nwawolo CC; Oyejola BA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Aug; 122(8):786-94. PubMed ID: 17666128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Comparison of various methods of evaluating auditory damage caused by chronic acoustic injury].
    Marcer G; Bizzotto R; Bartolucci GB; Saia BO
    G Ital Med Lav; 1985; 7(2-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 3836911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Recommendations for medical documentation in suspected occupationally-induced hearing loss].
    Baldus S; Jürgens WW; Niemeyer W; Plath P
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Jul; 78(7):410-1. PubMed ID: 10457527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Experiences with high-frequency hearing tests in the selection of personnel for noise occupations].
    Dieroff HG; Schuhmann G; Meissner W; Bartsch R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Nov; 70(11):594-8. PubMed ID: 1755897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of aircraft noise on hearing and auditory pathway function of airport employees.
    Chen TJ; Chiang HC; Chen SS
    J Occup Med; 1992 Jun; 34(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 1619492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Recommendations for medical documentation in suspected occupational hearing loss].
    Baldus S; Jürgens WW; Niemeyer W; Plath P
    HNO; 1999 Jul; 47(7):661-2. PubMed ID: 10463123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [From the expert's office: progress of hearing loss following acute acoustic trauma?].
    Brusis T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2008 Jul; 87(7):507-10. PubMed ID: 18553275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Audiometric evaluation of noise induced hearing loss.
    Ruth RA
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):639-54. PubMed ID: 471510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss.
    Shupak A; Tal D; Sharoni Z; Oren M; Ravid A; Pratt H
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 17721363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [From the expert's office: is the use of hearing aids in noise areas allowed? New developments in the hearing aid sector!].
    Brusis T; Sickert P
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Mar; 91(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 22368100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Quantitative evaluation of hearing disorders in expert assessment. A recent recommendation for calculating the percentage of hearing loss].
    Feldmann H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Jul; 67(7):319-25. PubMed ID: 3062285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The burdens of age-related and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the United States.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18469718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Hone SW; Norman G; Keogh I; Kelly V
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Industrial noise and presbyacusia in the determination of hearing damage: studies in chemical industry workers].
    Soleo L; Cancanelli G; Candillo G; De Santis MP; Lo Martire N
    Med Lav; 1991; 82(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 1770875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Extended high frequency audiometry in the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss].
    Somma G; Coppeta L; Magrini A; Parrella M; Cappelletti MC; Gardi S; Messina M; Bergamaschi A;
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(3 Suppl):258-60. PubMed ID: 18409674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.