These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15777441)
1. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term. Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term. Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary. Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction. Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term. Hassan AA J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial. Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison]. Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomised comparison of patient satisfaction with vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour at term. Nassar AH; Awwad J; Khalil AM; Abu-Musa A; Mehio G; Usta IM BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1215-21. PubMed ID: 17877674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial. Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2). Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial. Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial. Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial. Kalkat RK; McMillan E; Cooper H; Palmer K J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):695-9. PubMed ID: 19065363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming. Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy. Lee HY Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]