These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15778328)

  • 1. Evaluation of closed adult nucleus multiple ovulation and embryo transfer and conventional progeny testing breeding schemes for milk production in tropical crossbred cattle.
    Kosgey IS; Kahi AK; Van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1582-94. PubMed ID: 15778328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using embryo sexing within closed mixed multiple ovulation and embryo transfer schemes for selection on dairy cattle.
    Colleau JJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Nov; 74(11):3973-84. PubMed ID: 1757636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic trend for milk yield in Guzerat herds participating in progeny testing and MOET nucleus schemes.
    Peixoto MG; Verneque RS; Teodoro RL; Penna VM; Martinez ML
    Genet Mol Res; 2006 Jul; 5(3):454-65. PubMed ID: 17117360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
    Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Raadsma HW; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5455-66. PubMed ID: 20965361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the genetic trend of milk yield in the multiple ovulation and embryo transfer populations of dairy cows, using stochastic simulation.
    Hossein-Zadeh NG
    C R Biol; 2010 Oct; 333(10):710-5. PubMed ID: 20965440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic and economic responses for within-family marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Spelman RJ; Garrick DJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Nov; 81(11):2942-50. PubMed ID: 9839238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic analysis of traits affecting the success of embryo transfer in dairy cattle.
    König S; Bosselmann F; von Borstel UU; Simianer H
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Aug; 90(8):3945-54. PubMed ID: 17639006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structure of breeding programs to capitalize on reproductive technology for genetic improvement.
    Dekkers JC
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Oct; 75(10):2880-91. PubMed ID: 1430490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stochastic modeling of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer breeding schemes in small closed dairy cattle populations.
    Jeon GJ; Mao IL; Jensen J; Ferris TA
    J Dairy Sci; 1990 Jul; 73(7):1938-44. PubMed ID: 2229596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential improvements in rate of genetic gain from marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Meuwissen TH; Van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Jun; 75(6):1651-9. PubMed ID: 1500565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic gain in dairy cattle populations is increased using sexed semen in commercial herds.
    Sørensen MK; Voergaard J; Pedersen LD; Berg P; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Aug; 128(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 21749473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
    Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of variability in response to superovulation on donor cow selection differentials in nucleus breeding schemes.
    Keller DS; Teepker G
    J Dairy Sci; 1990 Feb; 73(2):549-54. PubMed ID: 2329209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of reciprocal differences in Bos indicus x Bos taurus backcross calves produced through embryo transfer: I. Birth and weaning traits.
    Amen TS; Herring AD; Sanders JO; Gill CA
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 17235021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Approaches to estimating daily yield from single milk testing schemes and use of a.m.-p.m. records in test-day model genetic evaluation in dairy cattle.
    Liu Z; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Kuwan K
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Nov; 83(11):2672-82. PubMed ID: 11104288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.