These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15779204)

  • 1. Kiss it XX better.
    Rahman T
    Ment Health Today; 2005 Feb; ():18-9. PubMed ID: 15779204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Freedom to go and come in health and medical social establishments, and health care and security obligations].
    ;
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2005 Jun; (81):139-55. PubMed ID: 16008139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the 6th right?
    Ness SJ
    Nurse Educ; 2004; 29(6):228; author reply 228. PubMed ID: 15586117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critique of the American Psychiatric Association's guidelines for state legislation on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Schmidt WC
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1985; 11(1):11-43. PubMed ID: 16100810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Psychiatric commitment, committing to protect].
    Ardon P; Fougère D; Senon JL
    Soins; 2005 May; (695):33-5. PubMed ID: 15921358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Civil commitment of mentally ill patients: developments in Flanders].
    Nys H; Vandenberghe J
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2008; 50 Spec no.():55-60. PubMed ID: 19067301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reconciling freedom to come and go and security in the admitted person].
    Ponte C
    Soins Gerontol; 2007; (64):43-4. PubMed ID: 17474240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benumbed.
    Schneider CE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 15852526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involuntary admission and the medical inpatient: judicious use of physical restraint.
    Clark MA
    Medsurg Nurs; 2005 Aug; 14(4):213-8; quiz 219. PubMed ID: 16206891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Coerced treatment according to the right to treatment regulation: never contrary to the will of mentally competent patients].
    Weber M
    Pflege Z; 2007 Apr; 60(4):222-4. PubMed ID: 17494432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts.
    Large MM; Ryan CJ; Nielssen OB; Hayes RA
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Dec; 34(12):877-81. PubMed ID: 19043114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Proposal for a treatment law based on the Scottish model].
    van Opstal JA; Lammers S
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2007; 49(10):719-28; discussion 729-31. PubMed ID: 17929225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An analysis of patient rights violations in psychiatric hospitals in Japan after the enactment of the Mental Health Act of 1987.
    Ohnishi K; Hayama Y; Kosugi S
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2008 Dec; 29(12):1290-303. PubMed ID: 19052946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Refusal of care].
    Chevillotte J; Venchiarutti L
    Rev Infirm; 2008 Jun; (141):30-2. PubMed ID: 18669384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
    Borger BA
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic intervention to improve patient information routines and satisfaction in a psychiatric emergency unit.
    Johnsen L; Oysaed H; Børnes K; Moe TJ; Haavik J
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2007; 61(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 17523034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Justice and equality in mental health law: the European experience.
    Hale B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 17157380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The past, present and future of mental health law: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis.
    Allan A
    Law Context; 2003; 20(2):24-53. PubMed ID: 16506344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
    Marshall GS
    Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):167-92. PubMed ID: 16998979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Jones v. Gerhardstein: the involuntarily committed mental patient's right to refuse treatment with psychotropic drugs.
    Ledwith DM
    Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(5):1367-98. PubMed ID: 16047454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.