These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15779269)
41. [Good reasons for mammography screening. About misunderstood criticism of underlying investigations!]. Garne JP; Hessov I Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Jul; 162(31):4165-7. PubMed ID: 10962925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [There is something wrong in the studies of mammography! No support for the conclusions on benefits of breast cancer screening]. Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(4):286-7. PubMed ID: 10684221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC Lancet; 2001 Oct; 358(9290):1340-2. PubMed ID: 11684218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Is mammography screening efficient? Let's open the debate]. Zappa M; Frigerio A Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(6):233-4. PubMed ID: 11878145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. Feig SA; Sickles EA; Evans WP; Linver MN J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug; 96(16):1260-1; author reply 1261. PubMed ID: 15316065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [Is overdiagnosing with 50 percent in mammography screening acceptable?]. Zahl PH; Maehlen J Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jan; 127(2):207-8; author reply 208. PubMed ID: 17237877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Mammography in mass-screening]. Van Bekkum DW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1977 Dec; 121(50):2009-12. PubMed ID: 927579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Detection by screening mammography is a powerful independent predictor of survival in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Johnson A; Shekhdar J Breast; 2005 Feb; 14(1):79. PubMed ID: 15695088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Mammography and screening for breast cancer. Tan EL Singapore Med J; 1993 Oct; 34(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 8153685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Mammography for mass screening]. van Bekkum DW Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1978 Apr; 122(17):600-4. PubMed ID: 652071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Risk of risk-based mammography screening, ages 40 to 49. American College of Radiology Task Force on Breast Cancer. Bassett LW; Cardenosa G; D'Orsi CJ; Dempsey PJ; Dershaw DD; Destouet JM; Evans WP; Feig SA; Hendrick RE; Jackson VP; Kopans DB; Linver MN; Mendelson EB; Monsees B; Racenstein MJ; Sickles EA; Stelling CB; Warren L J Clin Oncol; 1999 Feb; 17(2):735-8. PubMed ID: 10080624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Novel data on mammography: invitation to organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality]. Schulz-Wendtland R Strahlenther Onkol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):52. PubMed ID: 11977394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Screening mammography for breast cancer. A wise test when used in time. Wong JG; Feussner JR N C Med J; 1993 Jun; 54(6):257-60. PubMed ID: 8332222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Mammography screening under the age of 50. Hadden W N Z Med J; 1994 Jul; 107(982):297. PubMed ID: 8035971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Statement on X-ray and mammography and screening for breast cancer. Whitney LW Del Med J; 1975 Nov; 47(11):635-7. PubMed ID: 1183660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Mammography and Canadian screening]. Di Maggio C Radiol Med; 1992 Sep; 84(3):343-4. PubMed ID: 1410685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. AMWA endorses uniform mammography screening. Guinan M J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1990; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 2299127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Re: Interval breast cancers in the screening mammography program of British Columbia: analysis and classification. Kopans DB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1298-9. PubMed ID: 7717258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]