40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15779302)
1. [Problems with the ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) in the Bethesda system].
Nyklícek O
Ceska Gynekol; 2005 Jan; 70(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 15779302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Controversial categories in cytopathology of the uterine cervix. I. ASCUS: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance].
Cenci M; Chieppa A; Vecchione A
Minerva Ginecol; 2001 Feb; 53(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 11279396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical squamous and glandular cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS and AGUS) of the uterine cervix.
Cenci M; Vecchione A
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3701-7. PubMed ID: 11268442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance qualified: a follow-up study.
Kline MJ; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 8725142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria.
Thrall MJ; Pambuccian SE; Stelow EB; McKeon DM; Miller L; Savik K; Gulbahce HE
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Current laboratory practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory. Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Nielsen ML; Naryshkin S; Robb JA; Cohen T; Kline TS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 May; 120(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8639046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Significance of human papillomavirus test in triage of patients with atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance].
Zhao J; Zhou JN; Yang YJ; Liao QP
Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 22(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 19105350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [ASCUS: an update].
Boulanger JC; Sevestre H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jan; 34(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 16406731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Bethesda System. A proposal for reporting abnormal cervical smears based on the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnoses.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Erozan YS; Wacholder S; Kurman RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov; 116(11):1155-8. PubMed ID: 1444745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Educational needs and causes of false diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance at a university hospital.
Kumar N; Sayed S; Moloo Z
Afr J Reprod Health; 2011 Mar; 15(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 21987946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance cervical cytology with high-risk human papilloma virus genotypes.
Musa J; Taiwo B; Goldsmith S; Sutton S; Berzins B; Murphy RL
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Feb; 283(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 20229315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Support from authors of the Bethesda system.
Nayar R; Solomon D
Cytopathology; 2008 Dec; 19(6):399-400. PubMed ID: 19040548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnosis of cervical neoplasm--cytology].
Nishikawa A
Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Oct; 62 Suppl 10():113-8. PubMed ID: 15535217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Problems encountered with the Bethesda System: the University of Iowa experience.
Bottles K; Reiter RC; Steiner AL; Zaleski S; Bedrossian CW; Johnson SR
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):410-4. PubMed ID: 1876375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
