1478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15780165)
1. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study.
Djavan B; Mazal P; Zlotta A; Wammack R; Ravery V; Remzi M; Susani M; Borkowski A; Hruby S; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC; Marberger M
Prostate; 2001 May; 47(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 11340633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?
Djavan B; Ravery V; Zlotta A; Dobronski P; Dobrovits M; Fakhari M; Seitz C; Susani M; Borkowski A; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC; Marberger M
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1679-83. PubMed ID: 11586201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are repeat biopsies required in men with PSA levels < or =4 ng/ml? A Multiinstitutional Prospective European Study.
Djavan B; Fong YK; Ravery V; Remzi M; Horninger W; Susani M; Kreuzer S; Boccon-Gibod L; Bartsch G; Marberger M
Eur Urol; 2005 Jan; 47(1):38-44; discussion 44. PubMed ID: 15582247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1,051 men.
Djavan B; Zlotta A; Remzi M; Ghawidel K; Basharkhah A; Schulman CC; Marberger M
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1144-8; discussion 1148-9. PubMed ID: 10737484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of first repeat biopsy cancer detection with suspected local stage prostate cancer.
Fowler JE; Bigler SA; Miles D; Yalkut DA
J Urol; 2000 Mar; 163(3):813-8. PubMed ID: 10687983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No reason for immediate repeat sextant biopsy after negative initial sextant biopsy in men with PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or greater (ERSPC, Rotterdam).
Roobol MJ; van der Cruijsen IW; Schröder FH
Urology; 2004 May; 63(5):892-7; discussion 897-9. PubMed ID: 15134973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Update on Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center studies of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.
Fair WR; Betancourt JE
Mol Urol; 2000; 4(3):241-8;discussion 249-50. PubMed ID: 11062380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies.
Stewart CS; Leibovich BC; Weaver AL; Lieber MM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):86-91; discussion 91-2. PubMed ID: 11435830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective detection of clinically relevant prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen range 1 to 3 ng./ml. combined with free-to-total ratio 20% or less: the Aarau experience.
Recker F; Kwiatkowski MK; Huber A; Stamm B; Lehmann K; Tscholl R
J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):851-5. PubMed ID: 11490232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy.
Campos-Fernandes JL; Bastien L; Nicolaiew N; Robert G; Terry S; Vacherot F; Salomon L; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Yiou R; Patard JJ; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
Eur Urol; 2009 Mar; 55(3):600-6. PubMed ID: 18597923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
