BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15780358)

  • 41. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.
    Abbou CC; Cicco A; Gasman D; Hoznek A; Antiphon P; Chopin DK; Salomon L
    J Urol; 1999 Jun; 161(6):1776-80. PubMed ID: 10332433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney.
    Gill IS; Colombo JR; Moinzadeh A; Finelli A; Ukimura O; Tucker K; Kaouk J; Desai M
    J Urol; 2006 Feb; 175(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 16406970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a single-center evolving experience.
    Lifshitz DA; Shikanov SA; Deklaj T; Katz MH; Zorn KC; Eggener SE; Shalhav AL
    Urology; 2010 Feb; 75(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 19962732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic cryoablation for renal hilar tumors.
    Hruby G; Reisiger K; Venkatesh R; Yan Y; Landman J
    Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 16413331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Long-term follow-up of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma.
    Chung SD; Huang KH; Lai MK; Huang CY; Pu YS; Yu HJ; Chueh SC
    Urology; 2007 Apr; 69(4):652-5. PubMed ID: 17445645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases.
    Ramani AP; Desai MM; Steinberg AP; Ng CS; Abreu SC; Kaouk JH; Finelli A; Novick AC; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 15592022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison of clinical Stage T1 and T2 renal tumors.
    Gong EM; Lyon MB; Orvieto MA; Lucioni A; Gerber GS; Shalhav AL
    Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1183-7. PubMed ID: 17169642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm.
    Patel MN; Krane LS; Bhandari A; Laungani RG; Shrivastava A; Siddiqui SA; Menon M; Rogers CG
    Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):310-6. PubMed ID: 19945213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in a pediatric series.
    Robinson BC; Snow BW; Cartwright PC; De Vries CR; Hamilton BD; Anderson JB
    J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):638-40. PubMed ID: 12544332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients.
    Gill IS; Matin SF; Desai MM; Kaouk JH; Steinberg A; Mascha E; Thornton J; Sherief MH; Strzempkowski B; Novick AC
    J Urol; 2003 Jul; 170(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 12796646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients.
    Haber GP; White WM; Crouzet S; White MA; Forest S; Autorino R; Kaouk JH
    Urology; 2010 Sep; 76(3):754-8. PubMed ID: 20646744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre.
    Aron M; Koenig P; Kaouk JH; Nguyen MM; Desai MM; Gill IS
    BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18336600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of warm ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy on early postoperative glomerular filtration rate.
    Godoy G; Ramanathan V; Kanofsky JA; O'Malley RL; Tareen BU; Taneja SS; Stifelman MD
    J Urol; 2009 Jun; 181(6):2438-43; discussion 2443-5. PubMed ID: 19371905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses.
    O'Malley RL; Berger AD; Kanofsky JA; Phillips CK; Stifelman M; Taneja SS
    BJU Int; 2007 Feb; 99(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 17092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Complex laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors.
    Reisiger K; Venkatesh R; Figenshau RS; Bae KT; Landman J
    Urology; 2005 May; 65(5):888-91. PubMed ID: 15882717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Single-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery: initial operative experience and comparative outcomes.
    White WM; Goel RK; Kaouk JH
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1279-82. PubMed ID: 19362331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
    Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a comparative study.
    Taue R; Izaki H; Koizumi T; Kishimoto T; Oka N; Fukumori T; Takahashi M; Kanayama HO
    Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 19087210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of laparoscopic versus hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy.
    Kokkinos C; Nanidis T; Antcliffe D; Darzi AW; Tekkis P; Papalois V
    Transplantation; 2007 Jan; 83(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 17220789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Complications of contemporary open nephron sparing surgery: a single institution experience.
    Thompson RH; Leibovich BC; Lohse CM; Zincke H; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):855-8. PubMed ID: 16093969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.