138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15780458)
1. Past experience influences object representation in working memory.
Wagar BM; Dixon MJ
Brain Cogn; 2005 Apr; 57(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 15780458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.
Schendan HE; Kutas M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):734-49. PubMed ID: 17488201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Object perception is selectively slowed by a visually similar working memory load.
Robinson A; Manzi A; Triesch J
J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):7.1-13. PubMed ID: 19146273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent.
Sayala S; Sala JB; Courtney SM
Cereb Cortex; 2006 May; 16(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 16079245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The benefit of surface uniformity for encoding boundary features in visual working memory.
Kim SH; Kim JO
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1767-83. PubMed ID: 21967272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maintaining the ties that bind: the role of an intermediate visual memory store in the persistence of awareness.
Ferber S; Emrich SM
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Mar; 24(2):187-210. PubMed ID: 18416488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A core knowledge architecture of visual working memory.
Wood JN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):357-81. PubMed ID: 21463083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A memory span of one? Object identification in 6.5-month-old infants.
Káldy Z; Leslie AM
Cognition; 2005 Sep; 97(2):153-77. PubMed ID: 16226561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple levels of stimulus representation in visual working memory.
Shin E; Fabiani M; Gratton G
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):844-58. PubMed ID: 16768382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.
Hollingworth A; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):519-37. PubMed ID: 15161384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits.
Humphreys GW; Forde EM
Behav Brain Sci; 2001 Jun; 24(3):453-76; discussion 476-509. PubMed ID: 11682799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Activation and binding in verbal working memory: a dual-process model for the recognition of nonwords.
Oberauer K; Lange EB
Cogn Psychol; 2009 Feb; 58(1):102-36. PubMed ID: 18757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maintaining structured information: an investigation into functions of parietal and lateral prefrontal cortices.
Wendelken C; Bunge SA; Carter CS
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):665-78. PubMed ID: 18022652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Object appearance and picture-specific viewpoint are not integrated in long-term memory.
Varakin DA; Loschky L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jun; 63(6):1181-200. PubMed ID: 19830629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-trial object recognition in rats and mice: methodological and theoretical issues.
Ennaceur A
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 215(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 20060020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perirhinal and hippocampal contributions to visual recognition memory can be distinguished from those of occipito-temporal structures based on conscious awareness of prior occurrence.
Danckert SL; Gati JS; Menon RS; Köhler S
Hippocampus; 2007; 17(11):1081-92. PubMed ID: 17696171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments.
Sim EJ; Kiefer M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):260-73. PubMed ID: 15993764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative neuropsychological test battery differentiates cognitive signatures of Fragile X and Down syndrome.
Kogan CS; Boutet I; Cornish K; Graham GE; Berry-Kravis E; Drouin A; Milgram NW
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Feb; 53(2):125-42. PubMed ID: 19054268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
