These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15780458)

  • 41. Experimental dissociations between memory measures: influence of retrieval strategies.
    Willems S; Van der Linden M
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 19010060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Musical and verbal memory in Alzheimer's disease: a study of long-term and short-term memory.
    Ménard MC; Belleville S
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Oct; 71(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 19398148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination.
    Lehmann S; Murray MM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):326-34. PubMed ID: 15993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential.
    Berti S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 18294773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Object-based benefits without object-based representations.
    Fougnie D; Cormiea SM; Alvarez GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):621-6. PubMed ID: 23067063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Transformation direction influences shape-similarity judgments.
    Hahn U; Close J; Graf M
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Apr; 20(4):447-54. PubMed ID: 19309465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Category-use effects in children.
    Hayes BK; Younger K
    Child Dev; 2004; 75(6):1719-32. PubMed ID: 15566375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of linguistic labels on source-monitoring decisions.
    Geraci L; Franklin N
    Memory; 2004 Sep; 12(5):571-85. PubMed ID: 15615316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. In sight but out of mind: do competing views test the limits of perception without awareness?
    Brown M; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2004 Jun; 13(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 15134769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Working memory supports inference learning just like classification learning.
    Craig S; Lewandowsky S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1493-503. PubMed ID: 23931655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Feature-based versus category-based induction with uncertain categories.
    Griffiths O; Hayes BK; Newell BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):576-95. PubMed ID: 22060277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of similarity in updating numerical information in working memory: decomposing the numerical distance effect.
    Lendínez C; Pelegrina S; Lechuga MT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 23679060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Diagnosticity and prototypicality in category learning: a comparison of inference learning and classification learning.
    Chin-Parker S; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):216-26. PubMed ID: 14736308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Recognition memory as a function of encoding strategy and stimulus codability.
    Federico PA; Montague WE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Nov; 1(6):680-8. PubMed ID: 1185113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Indexing individual objects in infant working memory.
    Leslie AM; Kaldy Z
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Jan; 78(1):61-74; discussion 98-106. PubMed ID: 11161424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Memory errors from a change of standard: a lack of awareness or of understanding?
    Higgins ET; Liberman A
    Cogn Psychol; 1994 Dec; 27(3):227-58. PubMed ID: 7828422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Does the presence of more features in a bound representation in working memory require extra object-based attention?
    Zhou Y; Wu F; Wan X; Shen M; Gao Z
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1583-1599. PubMed ID: 34046872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The role of representational strength in verbal updating: evidence from 19- and 24-month-olds.
    Galazka MA; Ganea PA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 May; 121():156-68. PubMed ID: 24508916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Characterizing the information content of a newly hatched chick's first visual object representation.
    Wood JN
    Dev Sci; 2015 Mar; 18(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 24980274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Distinct visual working memory systems for view-dependent and view-invariant representation.
    Wood JN
    PLoS One; 2009 Aug; 4(8):e6601. PubMed ID: 19668380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.