These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The failure of Weber's law in time perception and production. Bizo LA; Chu JY; Sanabria F; Killeen PR Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):201-10. PubMed ID: 16386378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens). Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrimination of temporal relations by pigeons. Dreyfus LR; Fetterman JG; Smith LD; Stubbs DA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct; 14(4):349-67. PubMed ID: 3183576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). Nakamura N; Fujita K; Ushitani T; Miyata H J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 16893262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia). Makino H; Jitsumori M J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional tradeoffs in the pigeon. Vyazovska OV; Teng Y; Wasserman EA J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):337-54. PubMed ID: 24634281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Further analysis of perception of the standard Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens): effects of length of brackets. Nakamura N; Watanabe S; Fujita K J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 19685970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Absolute pitch: frequency-range discriminations in pigeons (Columba livia): comparisons with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and humans (Homo sapiens). Friedrich A; Zentall T; Weisman R J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 17324079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local rather than global processing of visual arrays in numerosity discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia). Emmerton J; Renner JC Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):511-26. PubMed ID: 19184137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons. Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia). Colombo M; Cottle A; Frost N J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep; 117(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 14498800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Timing light and tone signals in pigeons. Roberts WA; Cheng K; Cohen JS J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 2926333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination of holograms and real objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). Stephan C; Steurer MM; Aust U J Comp Psychol; 2014 Aug; 128(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 25133466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visually guided capture of a moving stimulus by the pigeon (Columba livia). Wilkinson A; Kirkpatrick K Anim Cogn; 2009 Jan; 12(1):127-44. PubMed ID: 18719954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]