BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15782524)

  • 1. Longevity of posterior tooth dental restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Feb; 136(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 15782524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
    Levin L; Samorodnitzky-Naveh G; Coval M; Geiger SB
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2008 Apr; 25(2):23-6, 73. PubMed ID: 18780542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam.
    Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):459-73. PubMed ID: 9604577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Materials for conservative posterior restorations.
    Donovan TE; Cho GC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):32-8. PubMed ID: 9120610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental materials for posterior restorations.
    Rykke M
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1992 Aug; 8(4):139-48. PubMed ID: 1291301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Worley DC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 22342563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
    Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth.
    Van Nieuwenhuysen JP; D'Hoore W; Carvalho J; Qvist V
    J Dent; 2003 Aug; 31(6):395-405. PubMed ID: 12878022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In Vitro Assessment of Retention and Resistance Failure Loads of Teeth Restored with a Complete Coverage Restoration and Different Core Materials.
    Tsiagali V; Kirmanidou Y; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e229-e236. PubMed ID: 29143388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct or indirect restorative dentistry--a mere choice about cost in relation to longevity?
    Waning A
    Dent Update; 2011; 38(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21366150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing long-term restoration survival in three private dental practices in Adelaide.
    Hawthorne WS; Smales RJ
    Aust Dent J; 1997 Feb; 42(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9078650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptability of alternatives for conservative restoration of posterior teeth.
    Christensen GJ
    J Esthet Dent; 1995; 7(5):228-32. PubMed ID: 8615985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longevity of posterior restorations.
    Mjör IA; Jokstad A; Qvist V
    Int Dent J; 1990 Feb; 40(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 2407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.