These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15782524)

  • 21. What German dentists choose for their teeth: A Web-based survey of molar restorations and their longevity.
    Beyer C; Schwahn C; Meyer G; Söhnel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):805-814. PubMed ID: 32444207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Study regarding coronal fracture probability in posterior amalgam restorations].
    Andrian S; Iovan G; Oncea C; Teodorovici P; Hasna M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 17571568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Approaches for intraoral repair of ceramic restorations.
    Latta MA; Barkmeier WW
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Aug; 21(8):635-9, 642-4; quiz 646. PubMed ID: 11199654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Longevity of the tooth/restoration complex: a review.
    Donovan TE
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2006 Feb; 34(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16724467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Long-term survival of extensive amalgams and posterior crowns.
    Smales RJ; Hawthorne WS
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):225-7. PubMed ID: 9175349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam Class II restorations.
    Tobi H; Kreulen CM; Vondeling H; van Amerongen WE
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Apr; 27(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 10226724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The coming demise of the cast gold restoration?
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1233-6. PubMed ID: 8803400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study.
    Dammaschke T; Nykiel K; Sagheri D; Schäfer E
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Aug; 39(2):48-56. PubMed ID: 23890259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The longevity of resin-based composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Hondrum SO
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 11199613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 2: All-ceramics and porcelain fused to metal systems.
    Blum IR; Jagger DC; Wilson NH
    Dent Update; 2011 Apr; 38(3):150-2, 154-6, 158. PubMed ID: 21667828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of volume of multi-surface restorations in posterior teeth: Treatment options.
    Janus C; Sbeih I; Best AM
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 22313920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Demolition experts: management of the parafunctional patient: 2. Restorative management strategies.
    Poyser N; Porter R; Briggs P; Kelleher M
    Dent Update; 2007 Jun; 34(5):262-4, 266-8. PubMed ID: 17624142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct posterior restorations: clinical results and new developments.
    Manhart J; García-Godoy F; Hickel R
    Dent Clin North Am; 2002 Apr; 46(2):303-39. PubMed ID: 12014036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Longevity versus esthetics: the great restorative debate.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jul; 138(7):1013-5. PubMed ID: 17606501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
    Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: A systematic review.
    Afrashtehfar KI; Emami E; Ahmadi M; Eilayyan O; Abi-Nader S; Tamimi F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):345-353.e8. PubMed ID: 27765400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bioaesthetic ceromer restorations for the replacement of existing posterior amalgam restorations.
    Ahmad I
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):416-8, 420. PubMed ID: 9655048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature.
    Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):433-42. PubMed ID: 17174661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.