These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15784416)

  • 1. A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data.
    Pantazis D; Nichols TE; Baillet S; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 15784416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation.
    Darvas F; Pantazis D; Kucukaltun-Yildirim E; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S289-99. PubMed ID: 15501098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving permutation test power for group analysis of spatially filtered MEG data.
    Chau W; McIntosh AR; Robinson SE; Schulz M; Pantev C
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):983-96. PubMed ID: 15528099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Random field-union intersection tests for EEG/MEG imaging.
    Carbonell F; Galán L; Valdés P; Worsley K; Biscay RJ; Díaz-Comas L; Bobes MA; Parra M
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 15110017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatiotemporal localization of significant activation in MEG using permutation tests.
    Pantazis D; Nichols TE; Baillet S; Leahy RM
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():512-23. PubMed ID: 15344484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis.
    Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods.
    Hayasaka S; Phan KL; Liberzon I; Worsley KJ; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):676-87. PubMed ID: 15193596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data.
    Jun SC; George JS; Paré-Blagoev J; Plis SM; Ranken DM; Schmidt DM; Wood CC
    Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 28(1):84-98. PubMed ID: 16023866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multivariate source prelocalization (MSP): use of functionally informed basis functions for better conditioning the MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Garnero L; Benali H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):356-73. PubMed ID: 15907296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hierarchical Bayesian estimates of distributed MEG sources: theoretical aspects and comparison of variational and MCMC methods.
    Nummenmaa A; Auranen T; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Sams M; Vehtari A
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(2):669-85. PubMed ID: 17300961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem.
    Sato MA; Yoshioka T; Kajihara S; Toyama K; Goda N; Doya K; Kawato M
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):806-26. PubMed ID: 15528082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.
    Maris E; Oostenveld R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Aug; 164(1):177-90. PubMed ID: 17517438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cluster mass permutation test with contextual enhancement for fMRI activation detection.
    Tillikainen L; Salli E; Korvenoja A; Aronen HJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):654-64. PubMed ID: 16769226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data-driven parceling and entropic inference in MEG.
    Lapalme E; Lina JM; Mattout J
    Neuroimage; 2006 Mar; 30(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16426867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative simulation of intracerebral epileptiform discharges: synthetic aperture magnetometry virtual sensor analysis of interictal magnetoencephalography data.
    Oishi M; Otsubo H; Iida K; Suyama Y; Ochi A; Weiss SK; Xiang J; Gaetz W; Cheyne D; Chuang SH; Rutka JT; Snead OC
    J Neurosurg; 2006 Jul; 105(1 Suppl):41-9. PubMed ID: 16871869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A verifiable solution to the MEG inverse problem.
    Barnes GR; Furlong PL; Singh KD; Hillebrand A
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):623-6. PubMed ID: 16480896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework.
    Mattout J; Phillips C; Penny WD; Rugg MD; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):753-67. PubMed ID: 16368248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distribution-based minimum-norm estimation with multiple trials.
    Kim JS; Han JM; Park KS; Chung CK
    Comput Biol Med; 2008; 38(11-12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 18995848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.