These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15784660)
1. What ails the FDA? Okie S N Engl J Med; 2005 Mar; 352(11):1063-6. PubMed ID: 15784660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Paying for drug approvals--who's using whom? Avorn J N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(17):1697-700. PubMed ID: 17435083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning the value of drugs--is rofecoxib a regulatory success story? Eisenberg RS N Engl J Med; 2005 Mar; 352(13):1285-7. PubMed ID: 15800222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Drug safety reform at the FDA--pendulum swing or systematic improvement? McClellan M N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(17):1700-2. PubMed ID: 17435081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PDUFA reauthorization--drug safety's golden moment of opportunity? Hennessy S; Strom BL N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(17):1703-4. PubMed ID: 17435082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What ails the FDA? Cohen FJ N Engl J Med; 2005 Jun; 352(24):2554. PubMed ID: 15962406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. User fees and beyond--the FDA Safety and Innovation Act of 2012. Kramer DB; Kesselheim AS N Engl J Med; 2012 Oct; 367(14):1277-9. PubMed ID: 23034017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What ails the FDA? Gorelick KJ N Engl J Med; 2005 Jun; 352(24):2553-4. PubMed ID: 15958814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Prescription Drug User Fee Act: is a faster Food and Drug Administration always a better Food and Drug Administration? Zelenay JL Food Drug Law J; 2005; 60(2):261-338. PubMed ID: 16094773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA. Villalba L; Witter J N Engl J Med; 2004 Dec; 351(27):2875-8; author reply 2875-8. PubMed ID: 15625745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Drug safety special: the safety catch. Wadman M Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):554-6. PubMed ID: 15800591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992: speeding up the drug approval process. Bierut MB Healthspan; 1992 Dec; 9(11):12-4. PubMed ID: 10123552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Vioxx debacle revisited. Mohapatra PR; Janmeja AK Am J Med; 2005 Sep; 118(9):1058. PubMed ID: 16164909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The big gap at the FDA. Stipp D Fortune; 2002 Jul; 146(2):113-4, 116. PubMed ID: 12141178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Raising the safety bar--the FDA's coxib meeting. Okie S N Engl J Med; 2005 Mar; 352(13):1283-5. PubMed ID: 15800221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Vioxx's history and the need for better procedures and better testing. Gilhooley M Seton Hall Law Rev; 2007; 37(4):941-68. PubMed ID: 18363218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. US lawmakers tackle safety reforms at the FDA. Zwillich T Lancet; 2007 Jun; 369(9578):1989-90. PubMed ID: 17577942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The politics of therapeutics. Somberg J Am J Ther; 2004; 11(6):422. PubMed ID: 15543080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The lessons of Vioxx. Frazier KC N Engl J Med; 2005 Sep; 353(13):1420-1; author reply 1420-1. PubMed ID: 16192497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]