These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15784942)

  • 1. Chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer for band cementation? An in vitro study.
    Millett DT; Doubleday B; Alatsaris M; Love J; Wood D; Luther F; Devine D
    J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15784942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial.
    Gillgrass TJ; Benington PC; Millett DT; Newell J; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11455377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.
    Veerabadhran MM; Reddy V; Nayak UA; Rao AP; Sundaram MA
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22565513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of orthodontic band cement at the cement-enamel and cement-band interfaces.
    Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H; Ulker M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 20362915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation into the use of two polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement used to retain orthodontic bands.
    Williams PH; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 15947223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs. conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation.
    Millett DT; Kamahli K; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Aug; 68(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 9709835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation.
    Dincer B; Erdinc AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 11990053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three cements used for orthodontic banding of porcelain molars.
    Herion T; Ferracane JL; Covell DA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 17029542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic cement for band fixation: an in vitro study.
    Uysal T; Yilmaz E; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 20552099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study.
    Ahluwalia P; Chopra S; Thomas AM
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 22565516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer for band cementation? An in vitro study.
    Ireland T
    J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 32(1):26. PubMed ID: 15816073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of environmental pressure changes on the retentive strength of cements for orthodontic bands.
    Gulve MN; Gulve ND; Shinde R; Kolhe SJ
    Diving Hyperb Med; 2012 Jun; 42(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 22828814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An ex vivo evaluation of resin-modified glass polyalkenoates and polyacid-modified composite resins as orthodontic band cements.
    Knox J; Chye KY; Durning P
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):323-8; discussion 301-2. PubMed ID: 15608348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.