BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1833 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15788095)

  • 1. Feature selection and nearest centroid classification for protein mass spectrometry.
    Levner I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():68. PubMed ID: 15788095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel feature selection approach for biomedical data classification.
    Peng Y; Wu Z; Jiang J
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Feb; 43(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 19647098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laplacian linear discriminant analysis approach to unsupervised feature selection.
    Niijima S; Okuno Y
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(4):605-14. PubMed ID: 19875859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What should be expected from feature selection in small-sample settings.
    Sima C; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2430-6. PubMed ID: 16870934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of feature selection and classification for MALDI-MS data.
    Liu Q; Sung AH; Qiao M; Chen Z; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Huang X; Deng Y
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Jul; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 19594880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature extraction and dimensionality reduction for mass spectrometry data.
    Liu Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Sep; 39(9):818-23. PubMed ID: 19646687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature selection and machine learning with mass spectrometry data.
    Datta S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1007():237-62. PubMed ID: 23666729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A high performance profile-biomarker diagnosis for mass spectral profiles.
    Han H
    BMC Syst Biol; 2011; 5 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S5. PubMed ID: 22784576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An entropy-based gene selection method for cancer classification using microarray data.
    Liu X; Krishnan A; Mondry A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():76. PubMed ID: 15790388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chaotic genetic algorithm for gene selection and classification problems.
    Chuang LY; Yang CS; Li JC; Yang CH
    OMICS; 2009 Oct; 13(5):407-20. PubMed ID: 19594377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Classification algorithms for phenotype prediction in genomics and proteomics.
    Ressom HW; Varghese RS; Zhang Z; Xuan J; Clarke R
    Front Biosci; 2008 Jan; 13():691-708. PubMed ID: 17981580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supervised feature selection in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling by blockwise boosting.
    Gertheiss J; Tutz G
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 25(8):1076-7. PubMed ID: 19233895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proteomic biomarker identification for diagnosis of early relapse in ovarian cancer.
    Oh JH; Nandi A; Gurnani P; Knowles L; Schorge J; Rosenblatt KP; Gao JX
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2006 Dec; 4(6):1159-79. PubMed ID: 17245808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eigengene-based linear discriminant model for tumor classification using gene expression microarray data.
    Shen R; Ghosh D; Chinnaiyan A; Meng Z
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 22(21):2635-42. PubMed ID: 16926220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is cross-validation better than resubstitution for ranking genes?
    Braga-Neto U; Hashimoto R; Dougherty ER; Nguyen DV; Carroll RJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 14734317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ovarian cancer identification based on dimensionality reduction for high-throughput mass spectrometry data.
    Yu JS; Ongarello S; Fiedler R; Chen XW; Toffolo G; Cobelli C; Trajanoski Z
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2200-9. PubMed ID: 15784749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guilt-by-association feature selection: identifying biomarkers from proteomic profiles.
    Shin H; Sheu B; Joseph M; Markey MK
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):124-36. PubMed ID: 17544868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ties problem resulting from counting-based error estimators and its impact on gene selection algorithms.
    Zhou X; Mao KZ
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2507-15. PubMed ID: 16908500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical assessment of feature selection methods for biomarker discovery in clinical proteomics.
    Christin C; Hoefsloot HC; Smilde AK; Hoekman B; Suits F; Bischoff R; Horvatovich P
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Jan; 12(1):263-76. PubMed ID: 23115301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 92.