These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15788383)
1. Field performance of the RespiCon for size-selective sampling of industrial wood processing dust. Rando R; Poovey H; Mokadam D; Brisolara J; Glindmeyer H J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 15788383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust. Thorpe A Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A survey of size-fractionated dust levels in the U.S. wood processing industry. Kalliny MI; Brisolara JA; Glindmeyer H; Rando R J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Aug; 5(8):501-10. PubMed ID: 18569517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance of personal inhalable dust samplers in wood-products industry facilities. Tatum VL; Ray AE; Rovell-Rixx DC Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jul; 16(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 11458924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively. Thorpe A; Walsh PT Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intersampler field comparison of Respicon(R), IOM, and closed-face 25-mm personal aerosol samplers during primary production of aluminium. Skaugset NP; Ellingsen DG; Notø H; Jordbekken L; Thomassen Y Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Oct; 57(8):1054-64. PubMed ID: 23792971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques. Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of the RespiCon personal aerosol sampler in forest products industry workplaces. Tatum V; Ray AE; Rovell-Rixx D AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2002; 63(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 12173181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct-reading inhalable dust monitoring--an assessment of current measurement methods. Thorpe A; Walsh PT Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Aug; 57(7):824-41. PubMed ID: 23704135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust. Linnainmaa M; Laitinen J; Leskinen A; Sippula O; Kalliokoski P J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler. Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source. Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers. Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beryllium aerosol characteristics in the magnesium and aluminum transformation industry in Quebec: a comparison of four different sampling methodologies. Dufresne A; Dion C; Viau S; Cloutier Y; Perrault G J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Nov; 6(11):687-97. PubMed ID: 19757293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of wood dust in three wood products industries. Harper M; Muller BS J Environ Monit; 2002 Oct; 4(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 12400909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exposure to dust and its particle size distribution in shoe manufacture and repair workplaces measured with GRIMM laser dust monitor. Stroszejn-Mrowca G; Szadkowska-Stańczyk I Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2003; 16(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 14964641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applications of low-cost, dual-fraction dust samplers. Kenny L; Chung K; Dilworth M; Hammond C; Wynn Jones J; Shreeve Z; Winton J Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 11137697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers. Görner P; Simon X; Wrobel R; Kauffer E; Witschger O Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):165-87. PubMed ID: 20147627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exposure to wood dust and its particle size distribution in a rubberwood sawmill in Thailand. Saejiw N; Chaiear N; Sadhra S J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Aug; 6(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 19444765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cotton dust and endotoxin levels in three Shanghai textile factories: a comparison of samplers. Astrakianakis G; Seixas N; Camp J; Smith TJ; Bartlett K; Checkoway H J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Aug; 3(8):418-27. PubMed ID: 16862712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]