These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15789)
41. [Interpretation of the fetal heart rate in pregnancy and labor]. Künzel W; Hohmann M Gynakologe; 1984 Dec; 17(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 6519556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of ruptured membranes on fetal heart rate patterns. Gabert HA; Stenchever MA Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Feb; 41(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 4684215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The results of a five-year study of continuous fetal monitoring on an obstetric service. Gabert HA; Stenchever MA Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 50(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 896094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Automatic calculation of surfaces in slowing of the fetal heart rate]. Sturbois G; Tournaire M; Ripoche A; Le Houezec R; Sureau C; Lepage F J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1974 Sep; 3(6):955-60. PubMed ID: 4470765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Labour: when to worry. Barwin BN; Dempsey A; Ivey B Can Med Assoc J; 1978 Feb; 118(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 630488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Fetal heart rate monitoring: for evaluation of fetal well-being. Hon HE Postgrad Med; 1977 Apr; 61(4):139-45. PubMed ID: 850661 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Comparison of the results of the non-stress test in the determination of fetal breathing during labor and after birth]. Pál A; Bártfai G; Kovács L Orv Hetil; 1986 Feb; 127(7):385-8. PubMed ID: 3951855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation. Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Reference values range of the fetal oxygen saturation and its dispersal during labor without cardiotocographic evidence for fetal distress]. Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Vakrilova L; Iarŭkova N; Tsankova M; Krŭsteva K Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 15853008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Prognostic significance of heart rate accelerations of the fetus in the first stage of labor]. Csapó Z; Szendei G; Szócska A; Csömör S Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(24):1493-500. PubMed ID: 3577454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and determination of fetal scalp blood pH in prediction of intrapartum fetal distress. Dai MS; Fox H Chin Med J (Engl); 1991 Feb; 104(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 1874012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Haverkamp AD; Thompson HE; McFee JG; Cetrulo C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 5895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The combined use of cardiotocography and fetal blood sampling in monitoring the fetus in labour. Simmons SC; Lieberman B J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1972 Sep; 79(9):816-20. PubMed ID: 4651293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The neonatal value of fetal monitoring. Hon EH; Zannini D; Quilligan EJ Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1974; 42():115-26. PubMed ID: 1209701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]