These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15789103)

  • 1. A 3-year longitudinal, controlled clinical study of a gallium-based restorative material.
    Dunne SM; Abraham R; Pankhurst CL
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):355-9; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 15789103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct-placement gallium restorative alloy: a 3-year clinical evaluation.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jan; 30(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 10323158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental post-operative sensitivity associated with a gallium-based restorative material.
    Dunne SM; Abraham R
    Br Dent J; 2000 Sep; 189(6):310-3. PubMed ID: 11060951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical properties and clinical performance of a gallium restorative material.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):241-5. PubMed ID: 8710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 2-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy.
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 9545902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation and microstructural analysis of a direct placement gallium restorative alloy.
    Neo J; Chew CL; Osborne JW; Mahler DB
    J Dent; 2000 Feb; 28(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 10666970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars.
    Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gallium restorative materials.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 64(9):645-7. PubMed ID: 9812433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
    Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro corrosion behavior and microstructure examination of a gallium-based restorative.
    DeSchepper EJ; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cook NB; Eggertson H
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):209-16. PubMed ID: 9484143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents.
    van Dijken JW
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 1817352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
    Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A three year follow-up of posterior doxadent restorations.
    Van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K
    Swed Dent J; 2005; 29(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 16035347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.