These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15789103)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems in a specialist practice setting.
    Salvi GE; Siegrist Guldener BE; Amstad T; Joss A; Lang NP
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 17305698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of admixed indium on the clinical success of amalgam restorations.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 1289867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo.
    Spreafico RC; Krejci I; Dietschi D
    J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Seven-year clinical evaluation of painful cracked teeth restored with a direct composite restoration.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Loomans BA; Bronkhorst EM
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):808-11. PubMed ID: 18570984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
    Can Say E; Kayahan B; Ozel E; Gokce K; Soyman M; Bayirli G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 16685291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings.
    Demarco FF; Cenci MS; Lima FG; Donassollo TA; André Dde A; Leida FL
    J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17034926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Photoelastic assessment of the expansion of direct-placement gallium restorative alloys.
    Osborne JW
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Mar; 30(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 10356572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year results.
    Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
    J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 19131153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-year clinical performance of eight amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 2076241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical performance of a self-etching and a total-etch adhesive system - 2-year results.
    Bekes K; Boeckler L; Gernhardt CR; Schaller HG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 34(11):855-61. PubMed ID: 17919253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - clinical performance and patient satisfaction.
    Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Chana HS; Kelleher MG; Porter RW; Patel MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):361-76. PubMed ID: 17441877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth.
    Hickel R; Kaaden C; Paschos E; Buerkle V; García-Godoy F; Manhart J
    Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):198-211. PubMed ID: 16158813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations.
    Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.