These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15789597)

  • 1. Regularization of inverse planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Chvetsov AV; Calvetti D; Sohn JW; Kinsella TJ
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):501-14. PubMed ID: 15789597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iterative regularization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy optimization.
    Carlsson F; Forsgren A
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):225-34. PubMed ID: 16485429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. L-curve analysis of radiotherapy optimization problems.
    Chvetsov AV
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2598-605. PubMed ID: 16193790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A particle swarm optimization algorithm for beam angle selection in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
    Li Y; Yao D; Yao J; Chen W
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3491-514. PubMed ID: 16030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beam orientation optimization for IMRT by a hybrid method of the genetic algorithm and the simulated dynamics.
    Hou Q; Wang J; Chen Y; Galvin JM
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2360-7. PubMed ID: 14528958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of radiobiological effects in intensity modulated proton therapy.
    Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):455-65. PubMed ID: 15789592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved stratification algorithms for step-and-shoot MLC delivery in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Süss P; Küfer KH; Thieke C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):6039-51. PubMed ID: 17881818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inverse plan optimization accounting for random geometric uncertainties with a multiple instance geometry approximation (MIGA).
    McShan DL; Kessler ML; Vineberg K; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1510-21. PubMed ID: 16752585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From physical dose constraints to equivalent uniform dose constraints in inverse radiotherapy planning.
    Thieke C; Bortfeld T; Niemierko A; Nill S
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2332-9. PubMed ID: 14528955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AI-guided parameter optimization in inverse treatment planning.
    Yan H; Yin FF; Guan HQ; Kim JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Nov; 48(21):3565-80. PubMed ID: 14653563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of equivalent uniform dose using the L-curve criterion.
    Chvetsov AV; Dempsey JF; Palta JR
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5973-84. PubMed ID: 17881813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of forward planning with automated inverse planning for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer without IMRT.
    Mendes R; Lavrenkov K; Bedford JL; Henrys A; Ashley S; Brada M
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 16564591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT.
    Yang Y; Xing L; Li JG; Palta J; Chen Y; Luxton G; Boyer A
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2937-47. PubMed ID: 14655941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
    Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A difference-matrix metaheuristic for intensity map segmentation in step-and-shoot IMRT delivery.
    Gunawardena AD; D'Souza WD; Goadrich LD; Meyer RR; Sorensen KJ; Naqvi SA; Shi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2517-36. PubMed ID: 16675867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction of IMRT beam complexity through the use of beam modulation penalties in the objective function.
    Matuszak MM; Larsen EW; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):507-20. PubMed ID: 17388168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins.
    Suzuki M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Hashiba H; Koike R; Kanamori S; Shibata T
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16564594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of techniques for simulating set-up error and uncertainty in head and neck IMRT.
    Ploquin N; Kay I; Rangel-Baltazar A; Lau H; Dunscombe P
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3213-9. PubMed ID: 17022214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving IMRT delivery efficiency using intensity limits during inverse planning.
    Coselmon MM; Moran JM; Radawski JD; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1234-45. PubMed ID: 15984674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A fourier analysis of the dose grid resolution required for accurate IMRT fluence map optimization.
    Dempsey JF; Romeijn HE; Li JG; Low DA; Palta JR
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):380-8. PubMed ID: 15789583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.