These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15789608)

  • 1. Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.
    Kyprianou IS; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):613-26. PubMed ID: 15789608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the microangiographic fluoroscope (MAF) using generalized system performance metrics.
    Jain A; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031915. PubMed ID: 23464330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study of the Generalized MTF and DQE for a New Microangiographic System.
    Kyprianou IS; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2004 May; 5368():349-360. PubMed ID: 21603129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. I. Experimental evaluation and feasibility.
    Ganguly A; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Kyprianou IS
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3018-28. PubMed ID: 14655949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generalized Performance Evaluation of X-ray Image Intensifier compared with a Microangiographic System.
    Yadava GK; Kyprianou IS; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2005; 5745(1):419-429. PubMed ID: 21311726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An image quality comparison of standard and dual-side read CR systems for pediatric radiology.
    Monnin P; Holzer Z; Wolf R; Neitzel U; Vock P; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 16532949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. II. Cascade model analysis.
    Ganguly A; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):3029-39. PubMed ID: 14655950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive model for x-ray projection imaging system efficiency and image quality characterization in the presence of scattered radiation.
    Monnin P; Verdun FR; Bosmans H; Pérez SR; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5691-5722. PubMed ID: 28557801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
    Bertolini M; Nitrosi A; Rivetti S; Lanconelli N; Pattacini P; Ginocchi V; Iori M
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SU-D-218-04: Evaluation of the Performance of the Solid State X-Ray Image Intensifier (SSXII) Using Generalized Metrics.
    Gupta S; Huang Y; Jain A; Bednarek D; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part3):3622. PubMed ID: 28517393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
    Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the imaging properties of an amorphous selenium-based flat panel detector for digital fluoroscopy.
    Hunt DC; Tousignant O; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1166-75. PubMed ID: 15191306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; MacKenzie A; Honey ID; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3806-17. PubMed ID: 19746814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generalized two-dimensional (2D) linear system analysis metrics (GMTF, GDQE) for digital radiography systems including the effect of focal spot, magnification, scatter, and detector characteristics.
    Jain A; Kuhls-Gilcrist AT; Gupta SK; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2010 Mar; 7622(76220K):. PubMed ID: 21243038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation.
    Neitzel U; Buhr E; Hilgers G; Granfors PR
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3485-91. PubMed ID: 15651631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.