These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15790065)

  • 1. Controversies in mammography.
    Timins JK
    N J Med; 2005; 102(1-2):45-9. PubMed ID: 15790065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
    Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of arbitration of discordant reports at double reading of screening mammograms.
    Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Risso G; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Mantellini P; Rosselli Del Turco M
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):125-7. PubMed ID: 16156942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme.
    Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Catarzi S; Risso G; Rosselli Del Turco M; Mantellini P
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 15949122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
    Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for breast cancer.
    Duffy SW; Smith RA; Gabe R; Tabár L; Yen AM; Chen TH
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):671-97. PubMed ID: 16226686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving mammographic interpretation: double reading and computer-aided diagnosis.
    Helvie M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):801-11, vi. PubMed ID: 17888770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geographic association between mammography use and mortality reduction in the US.
    Das B; Feuer EJ; Mariotto A
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Aug; 16(6):691-9. PubMed ID: 16049808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of interpretation of screening mammograms by a radiographer, a doctor and a radiologist: results and implications.
    Haiart DC; Henderson J
    Br J Clin Pract; 1991; 45(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 1931542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
    Lee CH; Weinreb JC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40-49 years.
    Ohnuki K; Kuriyama S; Shoji N; Nishino Y; Tsuji I; Ohuchi N
    Cancer Sci; 2006 Nov; 97(11):1242-7. PubMed ID: 16918992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women's anxieties caused by false positives in mammography screening: a contingent valuation survey.
    Yasunaga H; Ide H; Imamura T; Ohe K
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jan; 101(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 16821083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection (CAD) of cancers detected on double reading by one reader only.
    Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Collini G; Cruciani A; Ercolini E; Risso G; Rosselli Del Turco M
    Breast; 2006 Aug; 15(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 16236517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Streamlining mobile mammography services. Concern over loss of quality.
    McCue P
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Dec; 16(12):27-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 10285605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recent controversies in mammography screening for breast cancer.
    McTiernan A
    Medscape Womens Health; 2002; 7(2):3. PubMed ID: 12142859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
    Perry NM
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Computerised assessment of screening mammograms].
    den Heeten GJ; Karssemeijer N
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(18):A3035. PubMed ID: 21466728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.
    Sickles EA; Wolverton DE; Dee KE
    Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):861-9. PubMed ID: 12202726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.