110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15790179)
1. The heel prick: how efficient is common practice?
Naughten F
RCM Midwives; 2005 Mar; 8(3):112-4. PubMed ID: 15790179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Scottish study of heel-prick blood sampling in newborn babies.
Shepherd AJ; Glenesk A; Niven CA; Mackenzie J
Midwifery; 2006 Jun; 22(2):158-68. PubMed ID: 16386341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to capillary heelstick blood sampling in infants.
Folk LA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2007 Aug; 7(4):171-8. PubMed ID: 17700190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to ... take a newborn blood spot sample.
Midwives; 2013; 16(3):36-7. PubMed ID: 24868832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Examining the evidence for The International Confederation of Midwives' essential competencies for midwifery practice.
Fullerton JT; Thompson JB
Midwifery; 2005 Mar; 21(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 15740812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exercise of essential competencies for midwifery care by nurses in São Paulo, Brazil.
Narchi NZ
Midwifery; 2011 Feb; 27(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19892446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collecting the Newborn Screening Test (NST), via the heel prick.
Logan P
Aust Coll Midwives Inc J; 1997 Dec; 10(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 9555370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Blood without tears.
Warren C
Pract Midwife; 1998 Oct; 1(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10026576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Midwives: creators of community.
Bastien A
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (70):15-6. PubMed ID: 15310114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Current resources for evidence-based practice January/February 2005.
Sakala C
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2005; 50(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 15637516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Blueprint for raising maternity standards NSF broadly welcomed, but midwives urge culture change.
Pract Midwife; 2004 Oct; 7(9):7. PubMed ID: 15536814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between midwives and nurses.
Jones S
RCM Midwives; 2005 Jul; 8(7):320. PubMed ID: 16035440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring the best outcome for the least intervention: can the Optimality Index-US be applied in the UK?
Sheridan M; Sandall J
Midwifery; 2010 Dec; 26(6):e9-15. PubMed ID: 20005027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Past and present midwifery education in Turkey.
Sogukpinar N; Saydam BK; Bozkurt OD; Ozturk H; Pelik A
Midwifery; 2007 Dec; 23(4):433-42. PubMed ID: 17499895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence based midwifery practice: take care to 'mind the gap'.
Bick D
Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):569-70. PubMed ID: 21907879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour.
Freeman LM; Adair V; Timperley H; West SH
Women Birth; 2006 Dec; 19(4):97-105. PubMed ID: 17070742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MPs examine England's maternity services.
Bonar S
RCM Midwives; 2003 May; 6(5):192-3. PubMed ID: 12929347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Midwifery practice in New Zealand: a student perspective.
Lee W
RCM Midwives; 2005 May; 8(5):208-10. PubMed ID: 15960326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. From vision to reality: the development of a community maternity unit.
Leatherbarrow B; Winters P; Macleod L; Nicoll A; McNicol K; Hoggins K
RCM Midwives; 2004 May; 7(5):212-5. PubMed ID: 15232957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. IDM: a day for midwives across the globe.
Day-Stirk F
RCM Midwives; 2007 May; 10(5):214-5. PubMed ID: 17547026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
