These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15790927)

  • 1. Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter.
    Anderson AJ; Johnson CA; Fingeret M; Keltner JL; Spry PG; Wall M; Werner JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1540-8. PubMed ID: 15790927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry.
    Adams CW; Bullimore MA; Wall M; Fingeret M; Johnson CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 76(8):582-7. PubMed ID: 10472964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomy of a supergroup: does a criterion of normal perimetric performance generate a supernormal population?
    Anderson AJ; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):5043-8. PubMed ID: 14578433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal values for Octopus tendency oriented perimetry in children 7 through 13 years old.
    Brown SM; Bradley JC; Monhart MJ; Baker DK
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 243(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 15834603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normal intersubject threshold variability and normal limits of the SITA SWAP and full threshold SWAP perimetric programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):5029-34. PubMed ID: 14578431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer.
    Brenton RS; Phelps CD
    Ophthalmologica; 1986; 193(1-2):56-74. PubMed ID: 3822395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normative data set identifying properties of the macula across age groups: integration of visual function and retinal structure with microperimetry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Sabates FN; Vincent RD; Koulen P; Sabates NR; Gallimore G
    Retina; 2011; 31(7):1294-302. PubMed ID: 21358460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham SL
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 20447123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
    Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of visual field sensitivity to photoreceptor thickness in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Rangaswamy NV; Patel HM; Locke KG; Hood DC; Birch DG
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 51(8):4213-9. PubMed ID: 20220048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias.
    Taravati P; Woodward KR; Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Redline D; Carolan J; Huang CQ; Wall M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):924-8. PubMed ID: 18326713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threshold equivalence between perimeters.
    Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Alward WL; Skuta GL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 May; 107(5):493-505. PubMed ID: 2712132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standard Automated Perimetry: Determining Spatial Summation and Its Effect on Contrast Sensitivity Across the Visual Field.
    Khuu SK; Kalloniatis M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):3565-76. PubMed ID: 26047043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of an Age-corrected Normative Database for Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP).
    Tatham AJ; McClean P; Murray IC; McTrusty AD; Cameron LA; Perperidis A; Brash HM; Fleck BW; Minns RA
    J Glaucoma; 2020 Dec; 29(12):1106-1114. PubMed ID: 33264163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Kojetinsky S; Ostermaier N; Angstwurm K; Vivell PM; Schaumberger M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 May; 35(6):2741-8. PubMed ID: 8188467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying effects of retinal illuminance on frequency doubling perimetry.
    Swanson WH; Dul MW; Fischer SE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 46(1):235-40. PubMed ID: 15623778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intersession repeatability of humphrey perimetry measurements in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.
    Kim LS; McAnany JJ; Alexander KR; Fishman GA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4720-4. PubMed ID: 17898296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of dichoptic adaptation on frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Anderson AJ; Johnson CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 79(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 11868852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.