BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15791215)

  • 1. Obesity expert owns up to million-dollar crime.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):424. PubMed ID: 15791215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Academies seek better prospects for postdocs.
    Ebert J
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):426. PubMed ID: 15791219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):258-9. PubMed ID: 18354436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of NIH funds placed under a spotlight.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7059):601. PubMed ID: 16193003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lawmakers examine the possibility of favoritism in a $40-million NIH contract with Harvard.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2003 Nov; 50(13):A19. PubMed ID: 15287136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Universities and the money fix.
    Martinson BC
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):141-2. PubMed ID: 17851495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tie funding to research integrity.
    Titus S; Bosch X
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):436-7. PubMed ID: 20651673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It is time to update US biomedical funding.
    Grinnell F
    Nature; 2013 Sep; 501(7466):137. PubMed ID: 24025803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH grants $117 million in COBRE awards.
    National Center for Research Resources
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):28N. PubMed ID: 17133707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict of interest. Stung by controversy, biomedical groups urge consistent guidelines.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2007 Jul; 317(5837):441. PubMed ID: 17656694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomedical philanthropy: state of the donation.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):248-50. PubMed ID: 17507953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):728-9. PubMed ID: 12490902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
    Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agency under siege.
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7049):304. PubMed ID: 16034377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Invest in postdocs.
    Hoff KG
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5929):880. PubMed ID: 19443765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do researchers learn to overlook misbehavior?
    Heitman E; Anestidou L; Olsen C; Bulger RE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):49. PubMed ID: 16295264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics and fraud.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):117-8. PubMed ID: 16407910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.