BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15791536)

  • 1. A critical review of twenty years' use of the resource-ratio theory.
    Miller TE; Burns JH; Munguia P; Walters EL; Kneitel JM; Richards PM; Mouquet N; Buckley HL
    Am Nat; 2005 Apr; 165(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 15791536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is there really insufficient support for Tilman's R* concept? A comment on Miller et al.
    Wilson JB; Spijkerman E; Huisman J
    Am Nat; 2007 May; 169(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 17427140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of enrichment on the dynamics of apparent competitive interactions in stage-structured systems.
    Bonsall MB; Holt RD
    Am Nat; 2003 Dec; 162(6):780-95. PubMed ID: 14737715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Separating the influence of resource 'availability' from resource 'imbalance' on productivity-diversity relationships.
    Cardinale BJ; Hillebrand H; Harpole WS; Gross K; Ptacnik R
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Jun; 12(6):475-87. PubMed ID: 19490011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer effects on the vital rates of their resource can determine the outcome of competition between consumers.
    Lee CT; Miller TE; Inouye BD
    Am Nat; 2011 Oct; 178(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 21956024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coexistence and community structure in a consumer resource model with implicit stoichiometry.
    Orlando PA; Brown JS; Wise DH
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Sep; 82(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 22705543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A graphical theory of competition on spatial resource gradients.
    Ryabov AB; Blasius B
    Ecol Lett; 2011 Mar; 14(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 21265973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Putting competition strategies into ideal free distribution models: habitat selection as a tug of war.
    Flaxman SM; Reeve HK
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Dec; 243(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 16930625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prerequisites for and likelihood of generalist-specialist coexistence.
    Abrams PA
    Am Nat; 2006 Mar; 167(3):329-42. PubMed ID: 16673342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does competition between resources change the competition between their consumers to mutualism? Variations on two themes by Vandermeer.
    Abrams PA; Nakajima M
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):744-57. PubMed ID: 17926296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating support for the resource-ratio hypothesis: a reply to Wilson et al.
    Miller TE; Burns JH; Munguia P; Walters EL; Kneitel JM; Richards PM; Mouquet N; Buckley HL
    Am Nat; 2007 May; 169(5):707-8. PubMed ID: 17427141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantageous indirect interactions in systems of competition.
    Roberts A; Stone L
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Jun; 228(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 15135035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A sex allocation theory for vertebrates: combining local resource competition and condition-dependent allocation.
    Wild G; West SA
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):E112-28. PubMed ID: 17926288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of fluctuating resource supply in a habitat maintained by the competition-colonization trade-off.
    Chakraborty A; Li BL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2010 May; 1195 Suppl 1():E27-39. PubMed ID: 20586771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of functional constraints and opportunism on the functional structure of a vertebrate predator assemblage.
    Farias AA; Jaksic FM
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Mar; 76(2):246-57. PubMed ID: 17302832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competition-similarity relationships and the nonlinearity of competitive effects in consumer-resource systems.
    Abrams PA; Rueffler C; Dinnage R
    Am Nat; 2008 Oct; 172(4):463-74. PubMed ID: 18717636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ontogenetic diet shifts result in niche partitioning between two consumer species irrespective of competitive abilities.
    Schellekens T; de Roos AM; Persson L
    Am Nat; 2010 Nov; 176(5):625-37. PubMed ID: 20849269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of extinction in experimental populations.
    Griffen BD; Drake JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Nov; 77(6):1274-87. PubMed ID: 18557955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intermediate-consumer identity and resources alter a food web with omnivory.
    Kneitel JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):651-9. PubMed ID: 17584370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quasi-local competition in stage-structured metapopulations: a new mechanism of pattern formation.
    Utz M; Kisdi E; Doebeli M
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Jul; 69(5):1649-72. PubMed ID: 17265119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.