BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15791751)

  • 1. Chapter II. Differences between the telephone and personal interview data.
    Groves RM; Miller PV; Cannell CF
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):11-9. PubMed ID: 15791751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports.
    Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experimental comparison of telephone and personal health interview surveys.
    Thornberry OT
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):1-4. PubMed ID: 15791749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chapter III. Experimental interviewing techniques.
    Miller PV; Cannell CF
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):20-5. PubMed ID: 15791752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chapter V. A comparison of CATI and non-CATI questionnaires.
    Groves RM; Mathiowetz NA
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):33-9. PubMed ID: 15791754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chapter I. Study design.
    Cannell CF; Groves RM; Miller PV; Thornberry OT
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):5-10. PubMed ID: 15791750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chapter VI. Measurement of interviewer errors in the SRC Telephone Survey.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):40-6. PubMed ID: 15791755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chapter VII. Nonsampling bias and variance in the SRC Telephone Survey data.
    Groves RM; Magilavy LJ
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):47-50. PubMed ID: 15791756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparability of skin screening histories obtained by telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires: a randomized crossover study.
    Aitken JF; Youl PH; Janda M; Elwood M; Ring IT; Lowe JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 160(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 15353421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An introductory letter in advance of a telephone survey may increase response rate.
    Majowicz SE; Edge VL; Flint J; Sockett P; Doré K; McDougall L; Remple V; Fyfe M; Henson S; Gaebel K
    Can Commun Dis Rep; 2004 Jul; 30(13):121-3. PubMed ID: 15248524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between reports of care obtained by postdischarge telephone interview and predischarge personal interview.
    Minnick A; Young WB
    Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1999; 3(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 9934196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using standardized survey items with older adults hospitalized for chronic illness.
    Fox MT; Sidani S; Streiner D
    Res Nurs Health; 2007 Aug; 30(4):468-81. PubMed ID: 17654488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telephone surveys as a method for obtaining dietary information: a review.
    Fox TA; Heimendinger J; Block G
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1992 Jun; 92(6):729-32. PubMed ID: 1607571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing bias in telephone survey estimates of the prevalence of drug use: a randomized trial of telephone audio-CASI.
    Turner CF; Villarroel MA; Rogers SM; Eggleston E; Ganapathi L; Roman AM; Al-Tayyib A
    Addiction; 2005 Oct; 100(10):1432-44. PubMed ID: 16185205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telephone vs. mail surveys. Which is best for post-discharge data collection?
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Nov; 14(3):4-6. PubMed ID: 10175266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is there a language divide in pap test use?
    Ponce NA; Chawla N; Babey SH; Gatchell MS; Etzioni DA; Spencer BA; Brown ER; Breen N
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11):998-1004. PubMed ID: 17063131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The polling crisis: How to tell what people really think.
    Skibba R
    Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7625):304-306. PubMed ID: 27762379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Given the increasing bias in random digit dial sampling, could respondent-driven sampling be a practical alternative?
    Lee R; Ranaldi J; Cummings M; Crucetti JB; Stratton H; McNutt LA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 21(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 21376274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results.
    Hall MF
    J Health Care Mark; 1995; 15(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 10142388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The future of random-digit-dial surveys for injury prevention and violence research.
    Link MW; Kresnow MJ
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 17046417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.