These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights. Puurtinen M; Kaitala V Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ontogenetic colour change and the evolution of aposematism: a case study in panic moth caterpillars. Grant JB J Anim Ecol; 2007 May; 76(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 17439461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Honest signaling and the uses of prey coloration. Lee TJ; Speed MP; Stephens PA Am Nat; 2011 Jul; 178(1):E1-9. PubMed ID: 21670571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal defensive coloration strategies during the growth period of prey. Higginson AD; Ruxton GD Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19674097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations. Riipi M; Alatalo RV; Lindström L; Mappes J Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6855):512-4. PubMed ID: 11586357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals. Endler JA; Mappes J Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. Sherratt TN; Beatty CD Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 14582002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodal warning signals for a multiple predator world. Ratcliffe JM; Nydam ML Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7209):96-9. PubMed ID: 18769439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diurnal and nocturnal prey luring of a colorful predator. Chuang CY; Yang EC; Tso IM J Exp Biol; 2007 Nov; 210(Pt 21):3830-7. PubMed ID: 17951424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial neural networks and the study of evolution of prey coloration. Merilaita S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Mar; 362(1479):421-30. PubMed ID: 17255017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolutionarily stable defence and signalling of that defence. Broom M; Speed MP; Ruxton GD J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 16529773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage. Merilaita S Evolution; 2003 Jun; 57(6):1248-54. PubMed ID: 12894933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The signal environment is more important than diet or chemical specialization in the evolution of warning coloration. Prudic KL; Oliver JC; Sperling FA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Dec; 104(49):19381-6. PubMed ID: 18029450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of initial protection of conspicuous mutants for the coevolution of defense and aposematic signaling of the defense: a modeling study. Ruxton GD; Speed MP; Broom M Evolution; 2007 Sep; 61(9):2165-74. PubMed ID: 17767588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]