These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1579320)

  • 1. The fetal sound environment during vibroacoustic stimulation in labor: effect on fetal heart rate response.
    Gagnon R; Benzaquen S; Hunse C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):950-5. PubMed ID: 1579320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of abdominal vibroacoustic stimulation on sound and acceleration levels at the head of the fetal sheep.
    Abrams RM; Peters AJ; Gerhardt KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 9241296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation test: vibrator response characteristics in pregnant sheep postmortem.
    Peters AJ; Abrams RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 8423945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vibroacoustic stimulation and intrauterine sound pressure levels.
    Nyman M; Arulkumaran S; Hsu TS; Ratnam SS; Till O; Westgren M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):803-6. PubMed ID: 1923201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The intrauterine sound environment of the human fetus during labor.
    Benzaquen S; Gagnon R; Hunse C; Foreman J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 163(2):484-90. PubMed ID: 2386134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determinants of fetal heart rate response to vibroacoustic stimulation in labor.
    Richards DS; Cefalo RC; Thorpe JM; Salley M; Rose D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Apr; 71(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 3353043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrauterine sound levels: intrapartum assessment with an intrauterine microphone.
    Smith CV; Satt B; Phelan JP; Paul RH
    Am J Perinatol; 1990 Oct; 7(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 2222618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distance from an intrauterine hydrophone as a factor affecting intrauterine sound pressure levels produced by the vibroacoustic stimulation test.
    Eller DP; Scardo JA; Dillon AE; Klein AJ; Stramm SL; Newman RB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):523-7. PubMed ID: 7645631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation as a function of stimulus duration.
    Pietrantoni M; Angel JL; Parsons MT; McClain L; Arango HA; Spellacy WN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):807-11. PubMed ID: 1923202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal responses to different intensity levels of vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Yao QW; Jakobsson J; Nyman M; Rabaeus H; Till O; Westgren M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 75(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 2300347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is intrapartum vibroacoustic stimulation an effective predictor of fetal acidosis?
    Lin CC; Vassallo B; Mittendorf R
    J Perinat Med; 2001; 29(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 11776681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Blunted fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation associated with maternal intravenous magnesium sulfate therapy.
    Sherer DM
    Am J Perinatol; 1994 Nov; 11(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 7857429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Zimmer EZ; Divon MY
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 8437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrauterine noise levels produced in pregnant ewes by sound applied to the abdomen.
    Gerhardt KJ; Abrams RM; Kovaz BM; Gomez KJ; Conlon M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jul; 159(1):228-32. PubMed ID: 3394740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraabdominal sound levels during vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Graham EM; Peters AJ; Abrams RM; Gerhardt KJ; Burchfield DJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Apr; 164(4):1140-4. PubMed ID: 2014840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-over trial of fetal heart rate response to halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Bolnick JM; Garcia G; Fletcher BG; Rayburn WF
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Apr; 19(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 16854694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of vibration frequency and tissue thickness on intrauterine sound levels in sheep.
    Richards DS; Abrams RM; Gerhardt KJ; McCann ME
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Aug; 165(2):438-42. PubMed ID: 1872355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental change in fetal response to repeated low-intensity sound.
    Morokuma S; Doria V; Ierullo A; Kinukawa N; Fukushima K; Nakano H; Arulkumaran S; Papageorghiou AT
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 18171366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Controlled acoustic and photic stimulation of the fetus in the last pregnancy trimester].
    Boos R; Gnirs J; Auer L; Schmidt W
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1987; 191(4):154-61. PubMed ID: 3687152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrapartum vibratory acoustic stimulation of the human fetus during episodes of decreased heart rate variability.
    Divon MY; Braverman JJ; Guidetti DA; Langer O; Merkatz IR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Dec; 157(6):1355-8. PubMed ID: 3425643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.