These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1579332)
1. In vivo observation of surface precipitates of 200 consecutive hydrogel intraocular lenses. Amon M; Menapace R Ophthalmologica; 1992; 204(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1579332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cellular invasion on hydrogel and poly(methyl methacrylate) implants. An in vivo study. Amon M; Menapace R J Cataract Refract Surg; 1991 Nov; 17(6):774-9. PubMed ID: 1824047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluating biological tolerance of PMMA, heparin-modified PMMA and hydrogel intraocular lenses using slit lamp microscopy]. Amon M; Menapace R Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Feb; 200(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 1578872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative cellular reaction on surface modified intraocular lenses in living human eyes. Okada K; Tobari I J Cataract Refract Surg; 1991 May; 17(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 1861246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo study of cell reactions on poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses with different surface properties. Amon M; Menapace R; Radax U; Freyler H J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996; 22 Suppl 1():825-9. PubMed ID: 9279679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary study of hydrophilic hydrogel intraocular lens implants in cats. Yalon M; Blumenthal M; Goldberg EP J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1984; 10(3):315-7. PubMed ID: 6480483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cellular invasion on hydrogel and PMMA implants. Okada K J Cataract Refract Surg; 1992 May; 18(3):327-8. PubMed ID: 1593442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical and cytological characters of carbon, titanium surface modified intraocular lens in rabbit eyes. Yuan Z Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 241(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 12937994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility after implantation of sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Richter-Mueksch S; Kahraman G; Amon M; Schild-Burggasser G; Schauersberger J; Abela-Formanek C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1414-8. PubMed ID: 17662434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cell reaction and pigment deposits on the posterior chamber intraocular lens. Lumme P; Laatikainen L Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Feb; 72(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 8017190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lens epithelial growth on the anterior surface of hydrogel IOLs. An in vivo study. Lenis K; Philipson B Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Apr; 76(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 9591950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Specular microscopy of the anterior intraocular lens surface. Shah SM; Spalton DJ; Muir MK Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 5)():707-10. PubMed ID: 8287999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of lens cortex on postoperative inflammation and cellular deposits on surface of intraocular lenses in rabbit eye. Tamura M; Monson MC; Davis B; Mamalis N Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1991; 35(2):194-206. PubMed ID: 1779490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biocompatibility of silicone intraocular lenses]. Wenzel M; Kammann J; Allmers R Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Dec; 203(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 8145485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]