These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15793390)

  • 1. Comparison of two different direct digital radiography systems for the ability to detect artificially prepared periapical lesions.
    Folk RB; Thorpe JR; McClanahan SB; Johnson JD; Strother JM
    J Endod; 2005 Apr; 31(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 15793390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
    Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws.
    Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography.
    Patel S; Dawood A; Mannocci F; Wilson R; Pitt Ford T
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):507-15. PubMed ID: 19298574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions.
    Koenig L; Parks E; Analoui M; Eckert G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15140821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions.
    Paurazas SB; Geist JR; Pink FE; Hoen MM; Steiman HR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 10710463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using direct digital imaging.
    Meier AW; Brown CE; Miles DA; Analoui M
    J Endod; 1996 Oct; 22(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 9198437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The application of digital radiography and radiodensitometry in evaluation of chronic fibrous periapical changes of endodontically untreated teeth.
    Czelej-Górski J; Rózyło TK; Rózyło-Kalinowska I
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2001; 56():111-8. PubMed ID: 11977296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems.
    Scaf G; Sakakura CE; Kalil PF; Dearo de Morais JA; Loffredo LC; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 17082333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption.
    Durack C; Patel S; Davies J; Wilson R; Mannocci F
    Int Endod J; 2011 Feb; 44(2):136-47. PubMed ID: 21083575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
    Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peri-implant assessment via cone beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiography: an ex vivo study.
    Silveira-Neto N; Flores ME; De Carli JP; Costa MD; Matos FS; Paranhos LR; Linden MSS
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2017 Nov; 72(11):708-713. PubMed ID: 29236918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up.
    Patel S; Wilson R; Dawood A; Foschi F; Mannocci F
    Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):711-23. PubMed ID: 22775142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of five radiographic systems to D-speed film in the detection of artificial bone lesions.
    Hadley DL; Replogle KJ; Kirkam JC; Best AM
    J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1111-4. PubMed ID: 18718376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography.
    Sogur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG; Lomcali G; Sen BH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 19767516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Assessment of 3 radiographic methods (conventional periapical, digital periapical, and panoramic) ni the diagnosis of artificially produced periapical lesions].
    de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F; dos Santos JC
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2001; 15(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 11705317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.