These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15793578)

  • 61. Bimanual circling in deafferented patients: evidence for a role of visual forward models.
    Mechsner F; Stenneken P; Cole J; Aschersleben G; Prinz W
    J Neuropsychol; 2007 Sep; 1(2):259-82. PubMed ID: 19331020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Egocentric and allocentric visual cues influence the specification of movement distance and direction.
    Neely KA; Heath M; Binsted G
    J Mot Behav; 2008 May; 40(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 18477534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The specificity of practice hypothesis in goal-directed movements: visual dominance or proprioception neglect?
    Toussaint L; Meugnot A; Badets A; Chesnet D; Proteau L
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):407-414. PubMed ID: 26873383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. When more is less: increasing allocentric visual information can switch visual-proprioceptive combination from an optimal to sub-optimal process.
    Byrne PA; Henriques DY
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jan; 51(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 23142707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Late integration of vision and proprioception during perturbed reaches.
    Keyser J; Medendorp WP; Oostwoud Wijdenes L; Selen LPJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2023 Jun; 129(6):1282-1292. PubMed ID: 37073978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Contribution of proprioception for calibrating and updating the motor space.
    Bard C; Fleury M; Teasdale N; Paillard J; Nougier V
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 7621363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Evidence for distinct, differentially adaptable sensorimotor transformations for reaches to visual and proprioceptive targets.
    Bernier PM; Gauthier GM; Blouin J
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Sep; 98(3):1815-9. PubMed ID: 17634334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Similar brain networks for detecting visuo-motor and visuo-proprioceptive synchrony.
    Balslev D; Nielsen FA; Lund TE; Law I; Paulson OB
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):308-12. PubMed ID: 16406606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Mental motor imagery and the body schema: evidence for proprioceptive dominance.
    Shenton JT; Schwoebel J; Coslett HB
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Nov; 370(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15489010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Position coding in a video-controlled pointing task with a rotated visual display: evidence for individual differences in visuo-proprioceptive interaction.
    Coello Y; Milleville-Pennel I; Orliaguet JP
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Oct; 369(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 15464267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Micro movements of the upper limb in fibromyalgia: The relation to proprioceptive accuracy and visual feedback.
    Bardal EM; Roeleveld K; Ihlen E; Mork PJ
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2016 Feb; 26():1-7. PubMed ID: 26790141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Correcting for natural visuo-proprioceptive matching errors based on reward as opposed to error feedback does not lead to higher retention.
    Kuling IA; de Brouwer AJ; Smeets JBJ; Flanagan JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Mar; 237(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 30560507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. How timely can our hand movements be?
    de la Malla C; López-Moliner J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Oct; 31(5):1103-17. PubMed ID: 22534212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings.
    Krueger AR; Giannoni P; Shah V; Casadio M; Scheidt RA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):36. PubMed ID: 28464891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Proprioceptive feedback is reduced during adaptation to a visuomotor transformation: preliminary findings.
    Jones KE; Wessberg J; Vallbo A
    Neuroreport; 2001 Dec; 12(18):4029-33. PubMed ID: 11742233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Contributions of vision and proprioception to arm movement planning in the vertical plane.
    Apker GA; Karimi CP; Buneo CA
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Oct; 503(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 21889576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Reach adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration following exposure to misaligned sensory input.
    Cressman EK; Henriques DY
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Apr; 103(4):1888-95. PubMed ID: 20130036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Dynamic Multisensory Integration: Somatosensory Speed Trumps Visual Accuracy during Feedback Control.
    Crevecoeur F; Munoz DP; Scott SH
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(33):8598-611. PubMed ID: 27535908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The visual encoding of purely proprioceptive intermanual tasks is due to the need of transforming joint signals, not to their interhemispheric transfer.
    Arnoux L; Fromentin S; Farotto D; Beraneck M; McIntyre J; Tagliabue M
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Sep; 118(3):1598-1608. PubMed ID: 28615330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Increase in weighting of vision vs. proprioception associated with force field adaptation.
    Sexton BM; Liu Y; Block HJ
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10167. PubMed ID: 31308399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.